[Infowarrior] - CRS Report Leaks Prove Tough to Stop

Richard Forno rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue May 12 19:21:38 UTC 2009


CRS Report Leaks Prove Tough to Stop

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/54_129/news/34813-1.html

May 11, 2009

By Emily Yehle

Earlier this year, Wikileaks put more than 6,000 Congressional  
Research Service reports online, spawning excitement in the  
blogosphere, ire from some Members and an investigation by the  
inspector general of the Library of Congress.

But three months later, the reports are still online and the culprit  
is unknown.

IG Karl Schornagel said he hit a dead end a few weeks ago, after  
following the trail to the Senate. As clients of the CRS, Members and  
staffers have unfettered access to most of the CRS’ confidential  
reports online.

“These things could be leaked at any time in probably vast quantities  
by any staffer or Member of Congress,” Schornagel said recently. “We  
have no jurisdiction than to go further than their front door.”

That’s apparently where it will end. The IG’s office had discovered an  
anomaly, where a Senate Web site holding the CRS reports had updated  
twice, rather than the usual once. But Senate officials said that was  
a glitch in the system and not the reason for the leak, according to  
Schornagel.

A spokeswoman for Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer said the  
office is not conducting an investigation. The IG office, meanwhile,  
has referred the case to the FBI.

The case highlights the increasing difficulty of keeping CRS reports  
private as technology makes spreading information instantaneous and  
easy.

For a century, the CRS has produced confidential analyses to Members,  
answering questions on everything from specific legislation to broader  
policy issues. Some reports are made available to the entire Congress;  
others are memos and briefings in response to an individual Member or  
committee.

Their secrecy has been more a product of preference than one driven by  
classified information. Over the years, some Members — such as Sen.  
Joe Lieberman (ID-Conn.) — have attempted to make CRS reports easily  
accessible to the public.

But Congress and the CRS have resisted, citing worries about  
politicizing the analyses. Recently, CRS Director Daniel Mulhollan  
reiterated at an appropriations hearing that the agency’s work “must  
be authoritative, objective and confidential.”

In many cases, the Internet is responsible for making the reports  
easily accessible to the public. Web sites like OpenCRS.com and  
Wikileaks make it easy for sympathetic staffers and Members to pass  
along reports, while other companies, such as Roll Call Group’s  
GalleryWatch, are able to collect the reports and charge subscribers.

Despite its unwillingness to make the reports directly available to  
the public, the CRS is taking steps to make it easier for Members to  
share reports, setting up a system where they can feed reports onto  
their official Web site for constituents to read.

Such capabilities are the “newest step,” CRS spokeswoman Janine  
D’Addario said.

“Knowing of the interest that there is in Members wanting to make  
reports available to constituents or to a wider audience, I think this  
facilitates their ability to do that,” she said.

But some argue that reports should be made officially public because  
Members otherwise can simply pick and choose whatever reports support  
their opinions.

Reports gathered surreptitiously also may not get updated as  
frequently; D’Addario pointed to those on Wikileaks, which stretched  
back as far as 1990.

The 6,780 reports from Wikileaks are still available online in an easy- 
to-download PDF format. But none have been added since they were first  
leaked in February, and D’Addario said the agency has added security  
measures to its Web site. She wouldn’t give details, citing security  
concerns.

Still, Members and staffers can continue to download PDFs of reports  
in order to send them to constituents — or anyone else.

“If we have provided a Member of Congress or committee with  
information, then it is up to them” to decide whether to release it  
publicly, D’Addario said.



More information about the Infowarrior mailing list