[Infowarrior] - CRS Report Leaks Prove Tough to Stop
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue May 12 19:21:38 UTC 2009
CRS Report Leaks Prove Tough to Stop
http://www.rollcall.com/issues/54_129/news/34813-1.html
May 11, 2009
By Emily Yehle
Earlier this year, Wikileaks put more than 6,000 Congressional
Research Service reports online, spawning excitement in the
blogosphere, ire from some Members and an investigation by the
inspector general of the Library of Congress.
But three months later, the reports are still online and the culprit
is unknown.
IG Karl Schornagel said he hit a dead end a few weeks ago, after
following the trail to the Senate. As clients of the CRS, Members and
staffers have unfettered access to most of the CRS’ confidential
reports online.
“These things could be leaked at any time in probably vast quantities
by any staffer or Member of Congress,” Schornagel said recently. “We
have no jurisdiction than to go further than their front door.”
That’s apparently where it will end. The IG’s office had discovered an
anomaly, where a Senate Web site holding the CRS reports had updated
twice, rather than the usual once. But Senate officials said that was
a glitch in the system and not the reason for the leak, according to
Schornagel.
A spokeswoman for Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer said the
office is not conducting an investigation. The IG office, meanwhile,
has referred the case to the FBI.
The case highlights the increasing difficulty of keeping CRS reports
private as technology makes spreading information instantaneous and
easy.
For a century, the CRS has produced confidential analyses to Members,
answering questions on everything from specific legislation to broader
policy issues. Some reports are made available to the entire Congress;
others are memos and briefings in response to an individual Member or
committee.
Their secrecy has been more a product of preference than one driven by
classified information. Over the years, some Members — such as Sen.
Joe Lieberman (ID-Conn.) — have attempted to make CRS reports easily
accessible to the public.
But Congress and the CRS have resisted, citing worries about
politicizing the analyses. Recently, CRS Director Daniel Mulhollan
reiterated at an appropriations hearing that the agency’s work “must
be authoritative, objective and confidential.”
In many cases, the Internet is responsible for making the reports
easily accessible to the public. Web sites like OpenCRS.com and
Wikileaks make it easy for sympathetic staffers and Members to pass
along reports, while other companies, such as Roll Call Group’s
GalleryWatch, are able to collect the reports and charge subscribers.
Despite its unwillingness to make the reports directly available to
the public, the CRS is taking steps to make it easier for Members to
share reports, setting up a system where they can feed reports onto
their official Web site for constituents to read.
Such capabilities are the “newest step,” CRS spokeswoman Janine
D’Addario said.
“Knowing of the interest that there is in Members wanting to make
reports available to constituents or to a wider audience, I think this
facilitates their ability to do that,” she said.
But some argue that reports should be made officially public because
Members otherwise can simply pick and choose whatever reports support
their opinions.
Reports gathered surreptitiously also may not get updated as
frequently; D’Addario pointed to those on Wikileaks, which stretched
back as far as 1990.
The 6,780 reports from Wikileaks are still available online in an easy-
to-download PDF format. But none have been added since they were first
leaked in February, and D’Addario said the agency has added security
measures to its Web site. She wouldn’t give details, citing security
concerns.
Still, Members and staffers can continue to download PDFs of reports
in order to send them to constituents — or anyone else.
“If we have provided a Member of Congress or committee with
information, then it is up to them” to decide whether to release it
publicly, D’Addario said.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list