[Infowarrior] - DHS to Bolster Protection of Civilian Computer Networks
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue May 12 19:06:22 UTC 2009
DHS to Bolster Protection of Civilian Computer Networks
By Ellen Nakashima and Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:13 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/12/AR2009051201743_pf.html
The Department of Homeland Security will step up operations to secure
civilian computer networks against cyber attacks in coming years,
getting increases in funding and personnel, and coordinating
responsibilities now scattered across government agencies,
administration officials said this week.
The comments come as a comprehensive review of the nation's cyber
defenses before President Obama has triggered a broader debate over
whether the government is sufficiently mobilized and has the resources
to tackle complex cyber-security threats posed by sophisticated
criminal operations and states such as Russia and China. A debate over
the White House's role in leading the effort also is expected to be
resolved soon, with an announcement expected as early as the end of
this week, though more likely next week, sources said.
The review, led by Obama aide Melissa Hathaway, was aimed at crafting
a broad strategy to defend against debilitating cyber attacks --
against government sites and the increasingly global computer networks
of major telecommunications, financial, energy and other companies
that control critical infrastructure. But not all issues have been
resolved, sources said.
Officials said that under the plan, the National Security Agency would
continue to assist DHS in protecting civilian networks, despite
concern over the impact on Americans' privacy and the legal authority
for the military and intelligence agency to conduct domestic
surveillance activities. Legal reviews of that issue are ongoing,
officials said.
The extent to which the government should direct or guide actions by
owners of private commercial systems remains a matter of sharp
disagreement with industry and civil liberties groups and probably
will be deferred, said sources who have been briefed on the discussions.
Senior administration officials told reporters last month that the
report would establish that the White House would oversee and direct
interagency cyber efforts, but would leave operations to the relevant
agencies. They said the report would outline a strategic vision but
leave many major policy questions to officials to be named later.
The Pentagon and intelligence community have responsibility for
protecting military and classified networks, and are considering
creating a new cyber command to combine offensive and defensive cyber
efforts. Meanwhile, the Homeland Security Department was given a
greater role in defending civilian government systems last year under
the Bush administration's Comprehensive National Cyber Security
Initiative, a largely classified, five-year, $17 billion effort.
In his proposed 2010 budget last week, President Obama requested a
$177 million, or 16 percent, increase in spending for DHS's chief
information officer and Infrastructure Protection and Information
Security office, which include agencies that Bush identified as the
cornerstone of civilian coordination and preparedness efforts.
The full-time staff of the latter is projected to triple between 2008
and 2010, to 1,031 civilian workers.
Speaking to Washington Post editors and reporters Monday, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said the department expected
significant increases in cyber funding "not only this year but in
years to come."
"We will become, in effect, the non-DoD locus for cyber security,"
Napolitano said. "It makes sense to have a DoD focus and a non-DoD
focus, and I think that's functionally where it's going."
Napolitano acknowledged complaints that DHS lacks adequate skills and
personnel to achieve its mandate. However, she said the department
will continue to receive "technical assistance" from the NSA. Sources
said the department is expected to expand its cyber security
operations centers, pulling in non-defense components from across the
government, such as the Treasury Department.
"In reality a lot of that is the intersection of DHS and their .gov
sites, and their relationship to the banks and regulated communities.
They're all wrapped up together," Napolitano said.
Her remarks came after NSA Director Lt. Gen Keith B. Alexander told a
House panel last week that the Pentagon is considering creating a new
cyber command at Fort Meade, where the NSA is based, and after the
White House report is released, the Pentagon will begin to "walk
through" with industry what it can do to help them.
In an interview with The Washington Post after the hearing, he said he
thought DHS is "going to need the technical support" from NSA.
"Secretary Napolitano is superb at that," he said. "She knows how to
leverage us."
Though the NSA is acknowledged to have the skills to detect cyber
threats and exploit adversaries' vulnerabilities, the secrecy
surrounding its activities and recent controversy over its role in the
Bush administration's warrantless surveillance of Americans' e-mails
and phone calls have raised concerns over its participation in the
protection of non-military networks.
Among departments, the Pentagon and NSA also are wrestling with
battles over turf and sensitive legal and operational questions about
how and when to share classified information about computer threats
with the private sector.
At the White House, the review has triggered jockeying among the
National Economic Council and Office of Science and Technology Policy
and the National Security and Homeland Security councils. The number
of cyber-security incidents reported by federal agencies to the U.S.
Computer Emergency Readiness Team within the National Cyber Security
Division at DHS more than tripled between 2006 and 2008, the
Government Accountability Office, Congress's audit arm, reported last
week.
The GAO found weaknesses in security controls needed to detect or
prevent cyber attacks at 23 of 24 major agencies.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list