[Infowarrior] - AT&T takes the phone out of iPhone
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue Sep 22 12:36:55 UTC 2009
AT&T takes the phone out of iPhone
by Elinor Mills
http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10358156-245.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20
Three weeks ago, I got a call on a friend's iPhone while in the middle
of a desert; cell phone coverage had come to Burning Man. By contrast,
several calls I made last night to my parents from my San Francisco
apartment were dropped and a subsequent connection became garbled.
That happens daily when I try to converse on my first-generation
iPhone in my apartment and in certain other neighborhoods. I've come
to anticipate that if I can even make a call it's likely to be short-
lived or poor quality.
Frustrated by the numerous interrupted calls, I decided to try to find
out why my iPhone service is so poor that it's easier to have a Web
video conference over AIM with my boyfriend because neither of us can
use our iPhones (his is 3G) reliably inside either of our homes.
This is not a new problem. AT&T was criticized when traffic from
attendees at the South By Southwest conference in Austin, Texas,
overwhelmed the network earlier this year. And there were widespread
complaints about dropped calls and spotty service after the launch of
the iPhone 3G a year ago.
I wondered why, a year later, the service still seemed unreliable. I
called AT&T (on my reliable landline at work) to find out. AT&T
spokesman Mark Siegel blamed the problem on the increasing amount of
data traffic iPhone users are creating, which CNET News and others
wrote about earlier this month.
"We lead the industry in smart phones," he said. "As a result, we are
having to stay ahead of what is incredible and increasing demand for
wireless data services."
I wanted to know specifically why my problems haven't been resolved
nearly one-and-a-half years after getting my iPhone and why my voice
reception would be impacted by data traffic on a different network.
"Well, it wouldn't," Siegel conceded.
Initially, he had suggested that my problems were related to the fact
that the first-generation iPhone uses the EDGE data network, which is
slower than the 3G network. However, not only am I on a different data
network than the 3G data bandwidth hogs, but there should be no
connection between general data usage and my voice reception.
Other factors are at play, though, such as proximity to a cell tower,
the thickness of walls in the building and amount of demand on the
network at the time, according to Siegel.
Asked what AT&T is doing to address the reception problems, Siegel
said the company is rolling out 850 MHz frequency, which penetrates
walls better than the higher frequency 1900MHz band; adding 2,000 cell
towers to increase coverage; beefing up its back-haul capacity that
connects the cell towers to the Internet; spending as much as $18
billion this year to upgrade its wireless and broadband networks; and
moving to the LTE, or 4G, network standard known next year.
"We recognize unique challenges have been posed by all of these smart
devices being increasingly used by more and more people and I think we
are on the forefront of architecting our network to continue to stay
ahead of the demands that those devices place on our network," he said.
Despite listing the improvements AT&T plans to make, Siegel kept
insisting that there was no story here; that my concerns and the many
comments on the Apple iPhone forums about reception problems and
dropped calls was not newsworthy.
While I do have friends who report no problems with their iPhone
reception, many of my friends have complaints. I did an informal
survey of friends on Facebook and learned that people suffer from
dropped calls, as well as inaccessible voice mail and delayed voice
messages. Also, I am not alone in being forced to cut back on talking
on the phone as a result of the reception problems. Here are some
examples of the responses I got:
•"As soon as I move and do not have an ATT bundle, I am throwing the
iphone, and ATT in the trash," wrote a San Francisco friend using a
first-generation iPhone.
•"When i first got my iPhone (July 2007), i had fine coverage. In the
past nine months or so, something changed. Now i have *horrible*
reception in my neighborhood, especially in my apartment, and most
especially in my bedroom. My phone virtually never rings there, and i
almost never get voicemails or text messages until somewhere between 2
minutes and 2 hours after the communication went through," wrote
another first-generation Bay Area iPhone user on Facebook.
•"Terrible in SF. Probably 1 out of 3 calls gets dropped," wrote a 3G
iPhone user.
•"I've come to use it as a portable computer and a phone only in
emergencies. I hardly talk on the phone anymore," another Bay Area
friend who has a 3G iPhone told me.
•"My (3G iPhone) won't work inside my house. I'm thinking about
selling my house and finding a new one. Until then, I just use the
forwarding feature, but it's a pain. And yeah, it means I tend to talk
on the iPhone less. It's definitely a problem with my line o' work,
although I'm trying to use Google Voice to solve the problem, too,"
wrote a friend in Arizona.
Siegel was not amused.
"So you are actively asking folks to submit their experiences? Sorry,
but you and I have a basic disagreement about why you are doing this
story. What is the news here beyond what others have covered?" he
wrote in an e-mail.
Maybe I should pose that question to all the iPhone users who can't
make a basic phone call with their phones much of the time.
Siegel said he would look into my particular situation. I hope he does
and if so, I'll let you know what I find out.
While I can't speak for other parts of the country, there do seem to
be problems in San Francisco at least. This is significant given the
high percentage of iPhone users in the area.
What's your experience?
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list