[Infowarrior] - Europe Rejects Broadband ISP Three-Strikes Anti-Piracy Legislation
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Thu May 7 16:55:36 UTC 2009
Europe Rejects Broadband ISP Three-Strikes Anti-Piracy Legislation
By: MarkJ - 7 May, 2009 (7:57 AM) - Views: 340 - Categories: Illegal
Downloads
http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2009/05/07/europe-rejects-broadband-isp-three-strikes-anti-piracy-legislation.html
The European Parliament has, in its FINAL vote (there have been five
so far) on the matter, chosen to retain amendment 46 (138) of the new
Telecoms Package by a majority of 407 to 57. Amendment 46 states that
restrictions to the fundamental rights and freedoms of Internet users
can only be put in place after a decision by judicial authorities,
which protects ISPs from having to disconnect customers suspected of
involvement with illegal broadband file-sharing (P2P) downloads.
La Quadrature du Net confirms that the European Parliament has
nevertheless adopted a soft compromise on issues of network equity: no
strong protection against "net discrimination" was adopted.
"A formidable campaign from the citizens put the issues of freedoms on
the Internet at the center of the debates of the Telecoms Package.
This is a victory by itself. It started with the declaration of
commissioner Viviane Reding considering access to Internet as a
fundamental right. The massive re-adoption of amendment 138/46 rather
than the softer compromise negotiated by rapporteur Trautmann with the
Council is an even stronger statement. These two elements alone
confirm that the French 'three strikes' scheme, HADOPI, is dead
already." explains Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder of La Quadrature du
Net.
However it's not all good news as the changes do not prevent similar
schemes from being introduced by individual member states. Likewise
nothing will forbid ISPs from turning the Internet away from a neutral
zone where people have equal access to all content applications and
services. [geek]We doubt the Romulans would approve.[/geek]
"The strong statement for the access to the Internet as a fundamental
right demonstrates that the Parliament can be courageous and reject
the pressure to compromise when essential values are at stake.
Unfortunately, on issues that appear more technical such as the
absence of discrimination of services and contents on the Internet,
the Parliament did not take the full measure of what it is at stake
yet. Citizens must remain mobilized on these crucial questions,"
concludes Gérald Sédrati-Dinet, analyst for La Quadrature.
Mercifully we're unlikely to see Three-Strikes style legislation in
the UK, although some rights holders are still privately pushing for
it. To date the industry as a whole has failed to agree a concrete way
forward on the matter, although it's expected that Lord Carter's final
Digital Britain report (due in another month or so) may present one.
See our 'To Ban or Not to Ban (Illegal File Sharers)' – article for
more background to all this.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list