[Infowarrior] - Goldman Sachs Sues Blogger

Richard Forno rforno at infowarrior.org
Mon Apr 20 12:05:32 UTC 2009


Goldman Sachs Sues Blogger “Goldmansachs666.com”
Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - April 20th, 2009, 6:41AM

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/04/goldman-sachs-sues-blogger-goldmansachs666com/

Today, I added a new blog to the blog roll for the first time in months.

I urge you to do the same.

Why? Because they were sued by GS for criticizing the firm:

     “Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has been called many things over the  
years. Plenty of people have raged against its power and wealth. If  
you spend decades as the most successful investment bank, it goes with  
the territory. Calling it the devil may be going a bit far, though,  
even for the flinty-hearted employees of the New York-based bank.

     Last month, a blog called Goldmansachs666.com was set up. Goldman  
Sachs has taken legal action against the site, alleging it infringes a  
trademark in the phrase “Goldman Sachs.” The owner of the site,  
investment adviser Mike Morgan of Jensen Beach, Florida, has promised  
to contest the litigation and pursue similar campaigns against other  
banks.

     “They might think it is just a Mickey Mouse Web site, but we’re  
coming after them,” Morgan said in a telephone interview. “It would be  
really stupid for the banks to try and stop us. But banks do stupid  
things all the time.”

Let’s review your tax dollars at work: Godlman Sachs CEO Hank Paulson  
lobbied the SEC to allow the 5 largest iBanks to be exempt from net  
capital rules, and then leverage up 40 to 1. Which they did,  
especially with Mortgage-backed paper and derivatives. Then he becomes  
Treasury Secretary, and transfers from the taxpayers to these same  
iBanks — some directly, and some thru AIG — trillions of dollars.

Now, the taxpayer subsidized disaster creator is thin skinned about  
criticism. Note that the trademark claim is bullshit — its well  
settled law, via WalmartSucks.com. This 2000 case was originally found  
in favor of Wal-Mart by World Intellectual Property Organization but  
later reversed. Walmartsucks.com is no longer operating, but a new  
site, Walmartsucks.org appears to be run by author Kenneth J. Harvey.  
As another example of the legality of the “–sucks.com” sites, see  
also, disney-sucks.com.

No one seems to ever learn: If you want to close a critical site down,  
you ignore — you don’t sue them.

Thus, we add Goldmansachs666.com to the blog roll. If you have a blog,  
I STRONGLY suggest you do the same.


More information about the Infowarrior mailing list