[Infowarrior] - Bill Would Federalize Cybersecurity
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Wed Apr 1 01:08:27 UTC 2009
(The "unprecedented authority" mentioned in para 3 is rather
disturbing .... there is NEVER a black-and-white decision tree during
a cyber incident....what matters is the context of the given
incident. I remain skepticlal. --rf )
Bill Would Federalize Cybersecurity
Senate Proposal Would Affect Even Some Private Networks
By Joby Warrick and Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, April 1, 2009; A04
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/31/AR2009033103684_pf.html
Key lawmakers are pushing to dramatically escalate U.S. defenses
against cyberattacks, crafting proposals that would empower the
government to set and enforce security standards for private industry
for the first time.
The proposals, in Senate legislation that could be introduced as early
as today, would broaden the focus of the government's cybersecurity
efforts to include not only military networks but also private systems
that control essentials such as electricity and water distribution. At
the same time, the bill would add regulatory teeth to ensure industry
compliance with the rules, congressional officials familiar with the
plan said yesterday.
Addressing what intelligence officials describe as a gaping
vulnerability, the legislation also calls for the appointment of a
White House cybersecurity "czar" with unprecedented authority to shut
down computer networks, including private ones, if a cyberattack is
underway, the officials said.
How industry groups will respond is unclear. Jim Dempsey, vice
president for public policy at the Center for Democracy and
Technology, which represents private companies and civil liberties
advocates, said that mandatory standards have long been the "third
rail of cybersecurity policy." Dempsey said regulation could also
stifle creativity by forcing companies to adopt a uniform approach.
The legislation, co-sponsored by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman
John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) and Sen. Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine),
was drafted with White House input. While the White House indicated it
supported some key concepts of the bill, there has been no official
endorsement.
Many of the proposals were based on recommendations of a landmark
study last year by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Currently, government responsibility for cybersecurity is split: The
Pentagon and the National Security Agency safeguard military networks,
while the Department of Homeland Security provides assistance to
private networks. Previous cybersecurity initiatives have largely
concentrated on reducing the vulnerability of government and military
computers to hackers.
A 60-day federal review of the nation's defenses against computer-
based attack is already underway, and the administration has signaled
its intention to incorporate private industry into those defenses in
an unprecedented way.
"People say this is a military or intelligence concern, but it's a lot
more than that," Rockefeller, a former intelligence committee
chairman, said in an interview. "It suddenly gets into the realm of
traffic lights and rail networks and water and electricity."
U.S. intelligence officials have warned that a sustained attack on
private computer networks could cause widespread social and economic
havoc, possibly shutting down or compromising systems used by banks,
utilities, transportation companies and others.
The Rockefeller-Snowe measure would create the Office of the National
Cybersecurity Adviser, whose leader would report directly to the
president and would coordinate defense efforts across government
agencies. It would require the National Institute of Standards and
Technology to establish "measurable and auditable cybersecurity
standards" that would apply to private companies as well as the
government. It also would require licensing and certification of
cybersecurity professionals.
The proposal would also mandate an ongoing, quadrennial review of the
nation's cyberdefenses. "It's not a problem that will ever be
completely solved," Rockefeller said. "You have to keep making higher
walls."
Last week, Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair told
reporters that one agency should oversee cybersecurity for government
and for the private sector. He added that the NSA should be central to
the effort.
"The taxpayers of this country have spent enormous sums developing a
world-class capability at the National Security Agency on cyber," he
said.
Blair acknowledged there will be privacy concerns about centralizing
cybersecurity, and he said the program should be designed in a way
that gives Americans confidence that it is "not being used to gather
private information."
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list