[Infowarrior] - Think Your Social Security Number Is Secure? Think Again

[Richard Forno]

February 24, 2007
Your Money
Think Your Social Security Number Is Secure? Think Again
By DAMON DARLIN
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/business/24money.html?pagewanted=print

It should come as little surprise that Social Security numbers are posted on
the Internet. But, says Betty Ostergren, a former insurance claims
supervisor in suburban Richmond, Va., who has spent years trolling for them,
³people are always astounded² to learn that theirs is one of them.

Mrs. Ostergren, 57, has made a name for herself as a gadfly as she took on a
lonely and sometimes frustrating mission to draw attention to the situation.
With addresses, dates of birth and maiden names often associated with Social
Security numbers, she said, they are a gift to data thieves.

But in the last few weeks, Mrs. Ostergren¹s Web site, The Virginia Watchdog
‹ with the help of lobbying from an unexpected ally, America¹s farm bureaus
‹ is having an effect.

One by one, states and counties have started removing images of documents
that contain Social Security numbers, or they are blocking out the numbers.
Four states, including New York, have removed links to images of public
documents containing Social Security numbers.

Snohomish County, Wash., for example, said Wednesday that 61 types of
documents, including tax liens and marriage certificates, would be blocked.
(The documents are supposed to remain public at courthouses or state
offices.)

On Wednesday, the Texas attorney general, Greg Abbott, issued a legal
opinion that county clerks could be committing a crime by revealing Social
Security numbers on the Internet.

³I am almost in a celebratory mode,² said David Bloys, a retired private
investigator in Shallowater, Tex., who also highlights the public records
issue on his Web site, NewsforPublicOfficials.com.

For people wondering if they should be worried about the security of their
own numbers, there is a new tool to help them.

TrustedID, a company that sells services to consumers to give them more
control over who sees their credit reports, has compiled a database of
compromised numbers that could already be traded or sold on the Internet.

It has created an online search tool, StolenIDSearch.com, where people can
check at no cost to see if their number is one that is in a too-public
domain.

TrustedID said that about 220,000 people had tested their numbers in the
three weeks the site has been open to the public.

The Social Security number remains the personal identifier not only for
government documents, but for credit applications and medical records, as
well as video and cellphone stores.

³In the commercial world, it is ubiquitous when credit is offered,² said
Chris Jay Hoofnagle, a privacy advocate and senior fellow of the Berkeley
Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley. ³It
all flows from the credit system and it flows very far.²

Even though Americans are told to protect their Social Security number to
prevent identity theft, that is a tall order. The Social Security
Administration says its card ³was never intended and does not serve as a
personal identification document.²

But that has not been true about the number almost from outset. The Social
Security numbers that were first handed out in November 1936 as a means for
the federal government to track payments to the retirement system were soon
used for other purposes. They help track payrolls, loan payments, financial
transactions and income taxes.

They are necessary for anyone seeking public assistance, like food stamps,
or registering for the draft. Congress decreed that the numbers be put on
records including professional licenses, marriages licenses and divorce
decrees to better track scofflaws of child support orders.

The Social Security number took on a second role. It allowed collectors of
data to link pieces of information together, like a driver¹s license record,
credit report data and the information on the warranty card for a toaster.
That is a useful tool for marketers and just as useful for criminals.

It was only in 2004 that Congress prohibited states from using the Social
Security number on drivers¹ licenses. Yet the databases with those numbers
still exist. Until 2001, states could sell lists with those numbers, which
means that for virtually anyone 22 years or older, the name, address, phone
number and Social Security number are in private databases.

The nine-digit string took on a third role ‹ as a password that was supposed
to protect all that private information from snoops and criminals. But its
ubiquity defeats that purpose, Mr. Hoofnagle said. ³It will pass when the
business community no longer needs a Social Security number,² he said.

The Social Security Administration¹s Office of Inspector General said that
16 percent of the 99,000 fraud cases it investigated in the 12-month period
that ended Sept. 30 involved the misuse of Social Security numbers. One
involved an identify theft ring in Central Florida. Twelve people were
convicted, sentenced to prison and ordered to repay more than $2 million.

About 16,000 incidents are not a lot considering that 240 million numbers
are currently in use, and certainly theft and fraud involving credit card
numbers are much more pervasive.

But credit card numbers are rarely exposed on documents in public view. And
if a credit card is stolen or misused, obtaining a new one is a fairly
simple process. A new Social Security number is rarely granted. (Indeed, one
is limited to 3 replacements of the green paper Social Security card in a
year and 10 over a lifetime.)

Social Security numbers are routinely traded and sold by thieves over the
Internet like credit card numbers, says Panos Anastassiadis, chief executive
of Cyveillance, a company in Arlington, Va., that monitors online fraud
attempts for major financial institutions. His company has found caches of
them in Web chat rooms where they are offered as samples by criminals
selling even larger lists.

They are sometimes obtained by ³key logging² software surreptitiously
installed on home computers to record what is typed. Some come from
so-called phishing attacks in which people are misled into entering the data
on fake Web sites of banks or utilities.

The numbers are also out in the open. ³People think it is the banks, but
banks are very secure,² Mr. Anastassiadis said. ³The problem is every
dentist¹s office has Social Security numbers. Every doctor¹s office has
them. How secure are these?²

It has been Mrs. Ostergren¹s near obsession to answer that question.

Few things delight her more than finding a number belonging to a celebrity
because it draws attention to her cause.

³Oh, my Lord!² she exclaimed recently as she stumbled upon the Social
Security number of a member of the boldfaced set as she demonstrated how New
York State Web sites display documents containing names, addresses and
Social Security numbers. ³Let me download this one. This is Donald Trump¹s
number. I can¹t wait to tell him.²

Mrs. Ostergren never got through to Mr. Trump to confirm whether the
nine-digit identifier was indeed his, but she has found and tried to notify
others, including Kelly Ripa, the actress and talk-show host; Jeb Bush, the
former governor of Florida; Porter Goss, the former C.I.A. director; and
scores of state legislators. She posted links to some of those documents on
her site. (New York later made the documents unavailable, so the links no
longer work.)

She has found Social Security numbers on tax liens on the official site of
Maricopa County in Arizona. In Florida, as in many states, they appear on
documents consumers sign when they buy furniture or other merchandise on
credit.

Mrs. Ostergren wants the documents taken off the Web, and she applies
pressure by using the people whose numbers she finds. ³I¹ve been calling
people and telling them that they are exposed,² Mrs. Ostergren said. ³It is
not very hard to find the numbers. They are exposed everywhere.²

Her Web site may be cluttered with so many typefaces that it resembles a
ransom note, but she seems to be having an impact. In the last month she
found a pressure point: farmers.

Their numbers show up on Uniform Commercial Code filings when they buy
machinery or supplies on credit. She showed state farm bureau leaders their
numbers; they contacted their state legislators. She has also found common
cause with other gadflies like Mr. Bloys.

She has had her share of setbacks as well. Several state legislators tried
to ban her from posting information about their personal data that appeared
in public records. She wins no fans among legitimate companies who sell
databases. Removing the data from the Internet slows their ability to
collect public information, but does not stop them.

³There are a lot of people in the data brokerage business who don¹t like
what I do,² she said.