[Infowarrior] - Air Marshals: Innocent People Placed On 'Watch List' To Meet Quota.

Richard Forno rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue Jul 25 11:06:30 EDT 2006


Marshals: Innocent People Placed On 'Watch List' To Meet Quota
Marshals Say They Must File One Surveillance Detection Report, Or SDR, Per
Month

POSTED: 9:49 pm MDT July 21, 2006

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/9559707/detail.html

DENVER -- You could be on a secret government database or watch list for
simply taking a picture on an airplane. Some federal air marshals say
they're reporting your actions to meet a quota, even though some top
officials deny it.

The air marshals, whose identities are being concealed, told 7NEWS that
they're required to submit at least one report a month. If they don't,
there's no raise, no bonus, no awards and no special assignments.

"Innocent passengers are being entered into an international intelligence
database as suspicious persons, acting in a suspicious manner on an aircraft
... and they did nothing wrong," said one federal air marshal.

These unknowing passengers who are doing nothing wrong are landing in a
secret government document called a Surveillance Detection Report, or SDR.
Air marshals told 7NEWS that managers in Las Vegas created and continue to
maintain this potentially dangerous quota system.

"Do these reports have real life impacts on the people who are identified as
potential terrorists?" 7NEWS Investigator Tony Kovaleski asked.

"Absolutely," a federal air marshal replied.

7NEWS obtained an internal Homeland Security document defining an SDR as a
report designed to identify terrorist surveillance activity.

"When you see a decision like this, for these reports, who loses here?"
Kovaleski asked.

"The people we're supposed to protect -- the American public," an air
marshal said.

What kind of impact would it have for a flying individual to be named in an
SDR?

"That could have serious impact ... They could be placed on a watch list.
They could wind up on databases that identify them as potential terrorists
or a threat to an aircraft. It could be very serious," said Don Strange, a
former agent in charge of air marshals in Atlanta. He lost his job
attempting to change policies inside the agency.

That's why several air marshals object to a July 2004 memo from top
management in the Las Vegas office, a memo that reminded air marshals of the
SDR requirement.

The body of the memo said, "Each federal air marshal is now expected to
generate at least one SDR per month."

"Does that memo read to you that Federal Air Marshal headquarters has set a
quota on these reports?" Kovaleski asked.

"Absolutely, no doubt," an air marshal replied.

A second management memo, also dated July 2004, said, "There may come an
occasion when you just don't see anything out of the ordinary for a month at
a time, but I'm sure that if you are looking for it, you'll see something."

Another federal air marshal said that not only is there a quota in Las Vegas
for SDRs, but that "it directly reflects on (their) performance evaluations"
and on how much money they make.

The director of the Air Marshal Service, Dana Brown, declined 7NEWS' request
for an interview on the quota system. But the agency points to a memo from
August 2004 that said there is not a quota for submitting SDRs and which
goes on to say, "I do not expect reports that are inaccurate or frivolous."

But, Las Vegas-based air marshals say the quota system remains in force, now
more than two years after managers sent the original memos, and that it's a
mandate from management that impacts annual raises, bonuses, awards and
special assignments.

"To meet this quota, to get their raises, do you think federal air marshals
in Las Vegas are making some of this stuff up?" Kovaleski asked.

"I know they are. It's a joke," an air marshal replied.

"Have marshals in the Las Vegas office, I don't want to say fabricated, but
'created' reports?" Kovaleski asked.

"Creative writing -- stretching a long ways the truth, yes," an air marshal
replied.

One example, according to air marshals, occurred on one flight leaving Las
Vegas, when an unknowing passenger, most likely a tourist, was identified in
an SDR for doing nothing more than taking a photo of the Las Vegas skyline
as his plane rolled down the runway.

"You're saying that was not an accurate portrayal of a potential terrorist
activity?" Kovaleski asked.

"No, it was not," an air marshal said.

"It was a marshal trying to meet a quota ..." Kovaleski said.

"Yes, he was," the air marshal replied.

Strange said he didn't have a quota in the Atlanta office when he was in
charge.

"I would never have done that ... You are going to have people reporting
every suspicious looking activity they come across, whether they in their
heart feel like it's a threat, just to meet the quota," Strange said.

Strange and other air marshals said the quota allows the government to fill
a database with bad information.

A Las Vegas air marshal said he didn't write an SDR every month for exactly
that reason.

"Well, it's intelligence information, and like any system, if you put
garbage in, you get garbage out," the air marshal said.

"I would like to see an investigation -- a real investigation conducted into
the ways things are done here," the air marshal in Las Vegas said.

Although the agency strongly denies any presence of a quota system, Las
Vegas-based air marshals have produced documents that show their performance
review is directly linked to producing SDRs.




More information about the Infowarrior mailing list