[attrition] New Errata Page - Security Industry Plagiarism
security curmudgeon
jericho at attrition.org
Tue Mar 8 04:52:51 CST 2011
http://attrition.org/errata/plagiarism.html
Security Industry Plagiarism
According to dictionary.com, "Plagiarism" is "the unauthorized use or
close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the
representation of them as one's own original work." This appears to be a
simple explanation of the act of plagiarizing, but it is not. According to
the U.S. Copyright Office, "there is no specific number of words, lines,
or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the
source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining
permission." Title 17 > Chapter 1 > § 107 of the U.S. Code covers
Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use but does not outline a specific
amount of text or occurrences that define plagiarism.
Despite the law not giving a clear line between fair use and plagiarism,
most professionals understand the nature of the law and adhere to a level
of moral behavior that avoids plagiarism. By quoting small portions of
text, properly citing the original source and ensuring their work is done
in good faith, it is generally easy to avoid plagiarizing. The NYU
Journalism Handbook for Students contains a section on Research Materials
& Copyright that gives a good list of real world examples of what
constitutes plagiarism. Plagiarism.org offers a summary answer to the
question What is Plagiarism? The law offices of Morse Barnes-Brown
Pendleton published an article in Writer's Digest in 2001 explaining A
Writers' Guide to Fair Use. These resources should give a good guideline
of what is acceptable, and what is not.
Attrition.org uses the resources above to guide us in determining if a
piece of work contains plagiarized material. The types of plagiarism as
outlined by Plagiarism.org serve as a starting point. Instances where a
sentence or two are copied every so often are lazy, but not necessarily
plagiarism. We consider the amount of copied text versus the amount of
original work and weigh it against the expectation of original work. When
we find material that has a significant percentage of copied material, or
demonstrates signs that the author did not present original material
(e.g., building large blocks of text by copying single lines from multiple
sources), we consider it to be plagiarized.
[..]
More information about the attrition
mailing list