From: security curmudgeon (jericho@attrition.org)
To: DANIEL SMITH (spliffy56@hotmail.com)
Cc: Heathens (staff@attrition.org)
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 02:55:14 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: General Inquiry


:     Explain how mirroring the work of the people who you claim to be so
: thick can not contribute to the peoples thoughts about the intelligence
: and purpose behind your work. Who mirror the acts in the first place. 
: What are your thoughts?. 

Do you ask this of newspapers who print "police blotters" that document
nuisance crimes such as grafiti?

How about articles, papers, statistics and more covering street gangs? Do
you think the people that write or report on those events respect their
activities? No. But they are a fact of life.

: YOUR WEB SITE IS SUPERBLY RUN. BUT THE PURPOSE SOMETIMES IS FORGETTON AND IS 
: IT ONLY THERE FOR THE CONVIENCE OF OTHERS NOT YOURSELF.

Excuse me? This site is run for us, by us, in our time, with our
resources. The fact that others benefit from it is a nice side effect,
nothing more.

: A NON LAME REPLY WOULD BE APPRECIATED NONE WITH CHILDISH REMARKS OR SCANTY 
: HARD WORDS SAID BEHIND THE PROTECTION OF DISTANCE ITSELF.

When you resort to four lines of all CAPS.. and worse, that you ask what
you consider to be an honest question and dont expect a serious answer..

you are just BEGGING for childish remarks. and you seem to forget that
"protection of distance" is a two way street.