[VIM] Bugtraq IDs 43479 and 43523

[George A. Theall]

On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:14 PM, rkeith wrote:

> No difference, unfortunately.  BID 43523 has been retired.

Looks like the earlier BID isn't valid either:

   http://developers.phpjunkyard.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2711

and by extension CVE-2009-2592 / OSVDB 56552. Indeed, looking at the  
source, I don't see any SQL statements or mention of a 'mes_id'  
parameter / guestbook.php script.

> -Rob
>
> George A. Theall wrote:
>> What's the difference between Bugtraq IDs 43479 and 43523, Rob? Both
>> seem to have been created yesterday for an issue tracked by
>> CVE-2009-2592 and reported in July 2009.
>>
>>
>> George
>

George
-- 
theall at tenablesecurity.com