[VIM] Bugtraq Ids 19233 vs 44071

rkeith rkeith at securityfocus.com
Fri Oct 15 12:24:15 CDT 2010


Hey George,

Indeed, those will also be retired as duplicates.

We will be retiring 44060 as a false report shortly as well.

Thanks,
Rob

George A. Theall wrote:
> 
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:09 PM, rkeith wrote:
> 
>> We'll look into that one, but most likely it is a duplicate. Some of
>> the others are definitely duplicates.
>> This is what we found in our initial search:
> 
> Add to your list:
> 
>   - 44063, a duplicate of 19553 (Reporter component).
> 
>   - 44065, a duplicate of 18924 (SMF Forum component)
> 
> As for 44060, that was reported back in 2006 and covered by OSVDB 32535.
> It also seems like it might be bogus; ie,
> 
>   http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-11/0139.html
> 
> It doesn't seem that SecurityFocus created a BID for that earlier
> report. Did your earlier research indicate it was indeed bogus?  And has
> something changed this time?
> 
> George



More information about the VIM mailing list