[VIM] SeaMonkey 1.1.3 coverage

[George A. Theall]

On 07/30/07 20:23, Steven M. Christey wrote:

> Naturally, you had to point out a counter-example.  I must admit only
> checking about 3 Mozilla advisories.

Well, I did check them all last week when I wrote the recent Nessus 
plugin for it. And this was the only one of the recent bunch that 
mentioned Seamonkey, at least when I checked.

> So I guess we have some more inconsistencies on top of everything else.

Are you talking about inconsistencies in Redhat's advisory? Their bug 
report (248518) seems to lump Firefox / Thunderbird / Seamonkey 
together. Notice that RHSA-2007-0723 (covering Thunderbird) lists the 
same set of CVEs, except for CVE-2007-3656, as RHSA-2007-0722 (covering 
Seamonkey) even though if you cross-reference the advisories, you'll see 
that only CVE-2007-3734 and CVE-2007-3735 apply.


George
-- 
theall at tenablesecurity.com