From www.cyberyogi at gmail.com Thu Jan 5 05:51:55 2012 From: www.cyberyogi at gmail.com (cyber yogi) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:21:55 +0530 Subject: [Nikto-discuss] Wrong start and End Scan time in xml report Message-ID: Nikto gives wrong time of start and end Scan time in Xml report (i.e. niktoscan and scandetails tags in xml report). How can We correct that timing? Thanks Sullo :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From csullo at gmail.com Thu Jan 5 06:10:05 2012 From: csullo at gmail.com (csullo at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 07:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Nikto-discuss] Wrong start and End Scan time in xml report In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51E7D54A-9CB9-4D46-820C-1EF5CF6F92BA@gmail.com> Are you running the release version or trunk? Can you give some details -- show system time with date at scan start and then XML date? And can you check that system date is accurate? Thanks Sullo On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:51 AM, cyber yogi wrote: > > Nikto gives wrong time of start and end Scan time in Xml report (i.e. niktoscan and scandetails tags in xml report). > How can We correct that timing? > > Thanks Sullo :) > _______________________________________________ > Nikto-discuss mailing list > Nikto-discuss at attrition.org > https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/nikto-discuss From csullo at gmail.com Thu Jan 5 08:09:43 2012 From: csullo at gmail.com (Sullo) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Nikto-discuss] Wrong start and End Scan time in xml report In-Reply-To: References: <51E7D54A-9CB9-4D46-820C-1EF5CF6F92BA@gmail.com> Message-ID: You can download the current trunk dev release from here: https://trac.assembla.com/Nikto_2/changeset/719/trunk?old_path=%2F&format=zip Again, I would need some details to see what the discrepancy is, and confirm the system time is correct. Regards, Sullo On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:41 AM, cyber yogi wrote: > Sullo thanks for reply :) > > I am currently using the code which I have downloaded from your nikto > official site. > Is there any changes in code? > > Thanks :) > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, csullo at gmail.com wrote: >> >> Are you running the release version or trunk? Can you give some details -- >> show system time with date at scan start and then XML date? >> >> And can you check that system date is accurate? >> >> Thanks >> Sullo >> >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:51 AM, cyber yogi wrote: >> >> > >> > Nikto gives wrong time of start and end Scan time in Xml report (i.e. >> > niktoscan and scandetails tags in xml report). >> > How can We correct that timing? >> > >> > Thanks Sullo :) >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nikto-discuss mailing list >> > Nikto-discuss at attrition.org >> > https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/nikto-discuss > > -- http://www.cirt.net? ?? |? ? ? http://richsec.com/ From mike at orvant.com Sat Jan 7 14:02:38 2012 From: mike at orvant.com (Mike Palmer) Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:02:38 -0700 Subject: [Nikto-discuss] Wrong start and End Scan time in xml report In-Reply-To: References: <51E7D54A-9CB9-4D46-820C-1EF5CF6F92BA@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4F08A4DE.8090806@orvant.com> I'm not sure if this helps since I'm using the latest stable 2.1.4 but I've noticed some bugs as well. Here are the example times (roughly but correct) the command started and finished according to a process that ran nikto: started: 2011-10-31 07:29:27 finished: 2011-10-31 07:29:49 But if you look at the attached nikto xml output you'll see a couple problems: 1.) Dates incrementing instead of rolling: e.g. 2011-10-32 00:29:37 2.) Some years look uninitiated: e.g. Wed Dec 31 17:00:00 1969 3.) Different date formats: date 1 vs date 2 above 4.) scanstart and scanend are incorrect BTW, it ran GMT-7. Anyways, hope this helps clear up the problem. Mike Palmer On 1/5/12 7:09 AM, Sullo wrote: > You can download the current trunk dev release from here: > https://trac.assembla.com/Nikto_2/changeset/719/trunk?old_path=%2F&format=zip > > Again, I would need some details to see what the discrepancy is, and > confirm the system time is correct. > > Regards, > Sullo > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:41 AM, cyber yogi wrote: >> Sullo thanks for reply :) >> >> I am currently using the code which I have downloaded from your nikto >> official site. >> Is there any changes in code? >> >> Thanks :) >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, csullo at gmail.com wrote: >>> Are you running the release version or trunk? Can you give some details -- >>> show system time with date at scan start and then XML date? >>> >>> And can you check that system date is accurate? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sullo >>> >>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:51 AM, cyber yogi wrote: >>> >>>> Nikto gives wrong time of start and end Scan time in Xml report (i.e. >>>> niktoscan and scandetails tags in xml report). >>>> How can We correct that timing? >>>> >>>> Thanks Sullo :) >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nikto-discuss mailing list >>>> Nikto-discuss at attrition.org >>>> https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/nikto-discuss >> > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: nikto.xml Type: text/xml Size: 2650 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mike at orvant.com Sat Jan 7 14:11:47 2012 From: mike at orvant.com (Mike Palmer) Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 13:11:47 -0700 Subject: [Nikto-discuss] Wrong start and End Scan time in xml report In-Reply-To: <4F08A4DE.8090806@orvant.com> References: <51E7D54A-9CB9-4D46-820C-1EF5CF6F92BA@gmail.com> <4F08A4DE.8090806@orvant.com> Message-ID: <4F08A703.2020400@orvant.com> I apologize, these are in UTC while the rest should be in MST/GMT-7. So scanstart is actually correct in the nikto output unlike my previous response. The rest of the problems remain though. Mike Palmer On 1/7/12 1:02 PM, Mike Palmer wrote: > started: 2011-10-31 07:29:27 > finished: 2011-10-31 07:29:49 From www.cyberyogi at gmail.com Wed Jan 11 02:26:15 2012 From: www.cyberyogi at gmail.com (cyber yogi) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:56:15 +0530 Subject: [Nikto-discuss] Wrong start and End Scan time in xml report In-Reply-To: References: <51E7D54A-9CB9-4D46-820C-1EF5CF6F92BA@gmail.com> Message-ID: Dear Sullo, Please do check the attached image file(screen shot) and xml report where scanning date in terminal screen is incorrect. Earlier I was getting the same incorrect value of date in xml report but now it seems ok :) Thanks :) On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Sullo wrote: > You can download the current trunk dev release from here: > > https://trac.assembla.com/Nikto_2/changeset/719/trunk?old_path=%2F&format=zip > > Again, I would need some details to see what the discrepancy is, and > confirm the system time is correct. > > Regards, > Sullo > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:41 AM, cyber yogi > wrote: > > Sullo thanks for reply :) > > > > I am currently using the code which I have downloaded from your nikto > > official site. > > Is there any changes in code? > > > > Thanks :) > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, csullo at gmail.com > wrote: > >> > >> Are you running the release version or trunk? Can you give some details > -- > >> show system time with date at scan start and then XML date? > >> > >> And can you check that system date is accurate? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Sullo > >> > >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:51 AM, cyber yogi wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > Nikto gives wrong time of start and end Scan time in Xml report (i.e. > >> > niktoscan and scandetails tags in xml report). > >> > How can We correct that timing? > >> > > >> > Thanks Sullo :) > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Nikto-discuss mailing list > >> > Nikto-discuss at attrition.org > >> > https://attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/nikto-discuss > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.cirt.net | http://richsec.com/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: nikimage.jpeg Type: image/jpeg Size: 306793 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: nik_report.xml Type: text/xml Size: 3252 bytes Desc: not available URL: