[Infowarrior] - 'Happy Birthday' song copyright is not valid, judge rules

[Richard Forno]

(Couldn't happen to a nicer company!  --rick)

'Happy Birthday' song copyright is not valid, judge rules

Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-happy-birthday-song-lawsuit-decision-20150922-story.html

In a stunning reversal of decades of copyright claims, a federal judge has ruled that Warner/Chappell Music does not hold a valid copyright claim to the "Happy Birthday To You," song.

Warner had been enforcing its copyright claim since it paid $15 million to buy Birch Tree Group, the successor to Clayton F. Summy Co., which owned the original copyright. Royalties on the song bring in about $2 million a year for Warner, according to some estimates.

Interested in the stories shaping California? Sign up for the free Essential California newsletter >>

Judge George H. King ruled Tuesday afternoon that a copyright filed by the Summy Co. in 1935 granted only the rights to specific arrangements of the music, not the actual song itself.

"Because Summy Co. never acquired the rights to the Happy Birthday lyrics," wrote Judge George H. King, "Defendants, as Summy Co.'s purported successors-in-interest, do not own a valid copyright in the Happy Birthday lyrics."

This article will be updated.  

--
It's better to burn out than fade away.