[Infowarrior] - As CISPA Hits Congress, Cybersecurity Company Hypes The Fear Of Anonymous

[Richard Forno]

As CISPA Hits Congress, Cybersecurity Company Hypes The Fear Of Anonymous

from the fearing-fear-itself dept

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120423/13040318615/as-cispa-hits-congress-cybersecurity-company-hypes-fear-anonymous.shtml

Through TNW, we learn of a survey published by threat protection company Bit9 that states an attack by Anonymous is the number one thing IT security professionals fear. Doubtless the release of this survey was timed to coincide with CISPA, the dangerous cybersecurity bill that is being debated in the House this week. It's no surprise that a security provider would want to play up the fear of cyber attack, but I'm reminded of a quote from comedian Dara O'Briain: "Zombies are at an all time low level, but the fear of zombies could be incredibly high. It doesn't mean we have to have government policies to deal with the fear of zombies."

Apart from the fact that the fear of something is pretty meaningless (except to those who sell security, and those who want to pass bad laws), the details of the survey make it clear that this is entirely a matter of the hype around Anonymous:

< - >

61% believe that their organizations could suffer an attack by Anonymous, or other hacktivist groups. 

Despite the utter sense of fear that Anonymous has created over the years, 62% were more worried about the actual method of attack, with malware accounting for the most cause for concern at 48%. 

Only 11% of the respondents were concerned about one of Anonymous’ actual methods of attack – DDoS, while fears over SQL injections dipped to a measly 4%. Phishing was a concern for 17% of the respondents.

< - >

So, despite the fact that Anonymous apparently has them shaking in their boots, they know that their real vulnerability is malware—and that's not really Anonymous' game. The fear is manufactured.

What this survey calls attention to, though, is a fact that deserves more attention: under CISPA or a similar law, Anonymous would make a juicy target. Security companies and the government could collude and share data not only to strengthen their networks against attack, which would itself be perfectly reasonable, but also to identify and investigate Anonymous members, notwithstanding any other privacy laws. Regardless of how you feel about Anonymous' tactics, this should concern you: privacy rights and the 4th Amendment exist for a reason, and CISPA would wash them away online. The authors of the bill insist that it targets foreign entities, but it is arguably an even stronger weapon against domestic hacktivism that will inevitably be used and abused.


---
Just because i'm near the punchbowl doesn't mean I'm also drinking from it.