[Infowarrior] - The case for 'stealing' music

[Richard Forno]

Seeing this kind of cr--p makes me want to rush out and encourage everyone to pirate, share, and distribute 'copyrighted' materials, if for no other reasons than on principle (which this company apparently has none) and to support creativity enacted for noble purposes as evidenced by this little girl.    You think this girl is going to think twice about doing something similar in the future?  Of course she will......which is quite sad, in my view.   Charity, schmarity, when it comes to copyright-law.      -rick


Copyright Used To Silence 10-Year-Old Girl Raising Money For Charity

from the promoting-progress-all-around dept

Rob H was the first of a few of you to send in the story of how a music publishing company, Bourne Music Publishers, threatened 10 year-old actress Bethany Hale, for creating a short video of her acting as Charlie Chaplin accompanied by her singing the song Smile, which was the theme for Chaplin's 1936 film Modern Times. Hale had created the video and posted it to the charity site JustGiving as part of a campaign to raise money for a hospice. Modern times indeed. Of course, when Chaplin wrote the song, he was given a government-granted monopoly that he knew would put his work in the public domain by now. Until the government and lobbyists extended copyright again and again and again. 

Either way, Bourne Music Publishers apparently doesn't care much for charity. It demanded $2,000, plus another $200 every time she performed the song. That certainly would take away from the hospice that she was trying to raise money for, so now her Chaplin appreciation film is a Chaplin-style silent film instead.

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100722/09434710323.shtml