[Infowarrior] - FBI planning a bigger role in terrorism fight
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Fri May 29 03:12:24 UTC 2009
FBI planning a bigger role in terrorism fight
Bureau agents will gather evidence to ensure that criminal
prosecutions of alleged terrorists are an option. The move is a
reversal of the Bush administration's emphasis on covert CIA actions.
By Josh Meyer
May 28, 2009
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-fbi28-2009may28,0,694540.story
Reporting from Washington -- The FBI and Justice Department plan to
significantly expand their role in global counter-terrorism
operations, part of a U.S. policy shift that will replace a CIA-
dominated system of clandestine detentions and interrogations with one
built around transparent investigations and prosecutions.
Under the "global justice" initiative, which has been in the works for
several months, FBI agents will have a central role in overseas
counter-terrorism cases. They will expand their questioning of
suspects and evidence-gathering to try to ensure that criminal
prosecutions are an option, officials familiar with the effort said.
Though the initiative is a work in progress, some senior counter-
terrorism officials and administration policy-makers envision it as
key to the national security strategy President Obama laid out last
week -- one that presumes most accused terrorists have the right to
contest the charges against them in a "legitimate" setting.
The approach effectively reverses a mainstay of the Bush
administration's war on terrorism, in which global counter-terrorism
was treated primarily as an intelligence and military problem, not a
law enforcement one. That policy led to the establishment of the
prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; harsh interrogations; and detentions
without trials.
The "global justice" initiative starts out with the premise that
virtually all suspects will end up in a U.S. or foreign court of law.
That will be the case whether a suspected terrorist is captured on the
battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, in the Philippine jungle or in a
mosque in Nigeria, said one senior U.S. counter-terrorism official
with knowledge of the initiative.
"Regardless of where any bad guy is caught, we want the bureau to be
in a position to put charges on them," the official said, adding that
the Bush administration's emphasis on CIA and military operations
often marginalized the FBI -- especially when it came to interrogating
suspects.
Like others interviewed for this article, the official spoke on the
condition of anonymity because no one has been authorized to discuss
the initiative publicly. "We have no comment on it at this time," FBI
Assistant Director John J. Miller, the bureau's chief spokesman, said
when asked about the initiative.
Upon taking office in January, Obama shut down the CIA's secret "black
site" prisons and forbade the use of coercive interrogation techniques.
That opened the door for an increased role for the FBI, which for the
last year has deployed more agents and analysts overseas to work
alongside the CIA, U.S. military and foreign governments.
The initiative would mean even broader incorporation of the FBI and
Justice Department into global counter-terrorism operations. Many
national security officials said it is a vindication of the FBI, which
before Sept. 11 had played a leading role in international terrorism
investigations.
FBI agents for years had used non-coercive interrogations to thwart
attacks, win convictions of Al Qaeda operatives and gain an
encyclopedic knowledge of how the terrorist network operates. But they
withdrew from questioning important suspects after the bureau opposed
the tactics being used by the CIA and military -- often by
inexperienced civilian contractors.
The harsh interrogations provided such bad information that U.S.
agents spent years chasing false leads around the world, former FBI
agent Ali Soufan testified before Congress two weeks ago. "It was one
of the worst and most harmful decisions made in our efforts against Al
Qaeda."
Bush administration officials, however, have defended the tactics and
rejected claims that the FBI's methods would have worked better.
"With many thousands of lives potentially in the balance, we did not
think it made good sense to let the terrorists answer questions in
their own good time," former Vice President Dick Cheney said in a
speech this month.
The FBI itself has been criticized, as has the CIA, for failing to
connect the dots before the Sept. 11 attacks. In hindsight, the
evidence pointed to a clear and intensive Al Qaeda effort to launch
attacks on U.S. soil.
Before Sept. 11, the FBI model of "informed" interrogation -- knowing
everything about a suspect to get them talking -- was the preferred
method of intelligence and military interrogators.
Even veteran CIA agents said that abandoning that approach after Sept.
11 was counterproductive. "To use a contractor to ask the questions
and not let the FBI guy who's collected all the evidence and knows all
of the intelligence about these guys, it makes no sense at all," said
former CIA counter-terrorism case agent Robert Baer.
One intelligence official said the FBI's expanded role in the global
fight against terrorism was a natural outgrowth of the Obama
administration's new priorities. "It stands to reason because, by
executive order, the CIA is out of the long-term detention business,"
the official said, referring to Obama's closing of overseas prisons.
Richard Clarke, a senior counter-terrorism official in the Clinton and
George W. Bush administrations, said the turnabout was long overdue.
"We have to return to the practice that we had before of arresting
terrorists and putting them on trial," said Clarke, who added that the
country's ability to do that "has atrophied."
CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said the agency would continue to play a
central role in interrogations and counter-terrorism operations --
using techniques approved by the U.S. Army Field Manual-- in
conjunction with other U.S. agencies.
Behind the scenes, some intelligence officials are resisting a broader
criminal justice role overseas for the FBI, contending that it could
inhibit the flow of intelligence if their own agents, or foreign
governments, believe top-secret sources and methods might be disclosed
during criminal prosecutions.
Two senior U.S. officials said efforts are being made to ensure that
intelligence-gathering and law enforcement efforts proceed side by
side. They stressed that the CIA and military would continue to play
pivotal roles, particularly in gaining strategic intelligence against
terrorist groups and thwarting future attacks.
josh.meyer at latimes.com
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list