[Infowarrior] - FBI Use of Patriot Act Authority Increased Dramatically in 2008
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Wed May 20 01:27:35 UTC 2009
Threat Level Privacy, Crime and Security Online
FBI Use of Patriot Act Authority Increased Dramatically in 2008
* By Kim Zetter Email Author
* May 19, 2009 |
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/fbi-use-of-patriot-act-authority-increased-dramatically-in-2008/
FISA-court authorizations for national security and counter-terrorism
wiretaps dropped last year by almost 300, a new Justice Department
report to Congress shows. But the FBI’s use of “national security
letters” to get information on Americans without a court order
increased dramatically, from 16,804 in 2007 to 24,744 in 2008.
The 2008 requests targeted 7,225 U.S. people.
This is still much lower than the number of NSLs issued in 2006 — more
than 49,000 — but indicates that the FBI’s reliance on the self-
authorized subpoenas is rebounding, after audits in 2006 and 2007
revealed the bureau had been abusing the tool.
The new seven-page report (.pdf) was submitted to Congress last
Thursday.
National security letters (NSL) are written demands from the FBI that
compel internet service providers, credit companies, financial
institutions and others to hand over confidential records about their
customers, such as subscriber information, phone numbers and e-mail
addresses, websites visited and more.
NSLs have been used since the 1980s, but the Patriot Act expanded the
kinds of records that could be obtained with an NSL. They do not
require court approval, and come with a built-in lifetime gag order.
With an NSL, the FBI need merely assert that the information is
“relevant” to an investigation, and anyone who gets a national
security letter is prohibited from disclosing that they’ve received
the request.
The FBI’s use of NSLs has been sharply criticized. In 2007, a Justice
Department Inspector General audit found that the FBI, which issued
almost 200,000 NSLs between 2003 and 2006, had abused its authority
and misused NSLs.
The inspector general found that the FBI evaded limits on (and
sometimes illegally issued) NSLs to obtain phone, e-mail and financial
information on American citizens, and under-reported the use of NSLs
to Congress.
About 60 percent of a sample of the FBI’s NSLs did not conform to
Justice Department rules, and another 22 percent possibly violated the
statute because they made improper requests of businesses or involved
unauthorized collections of information.
The audit also criticized the FBI for improperly tracking its use of
NSLs.
Subsequently, the number of NSLs issued in 2007 dramatically dropped
from 49,000 to 16,000.
The new 2009 DoJ report submitted to Congress last week addresses
these earlier issues by assuring legislators that the FBI has put in a
number of corrective actions.
According to the report, the FBI replaced the database it used for
tracking NSLs, which “has reduced errors in compiling statistics
necessary for Congressional reporting.”
The report says the FBI also issued a number of “corrective NSLs” to
“provide legal authority to retain information it had previously
received” for so-called “exigent” requests and “blanket NSLs”. Exigent
requests involve an informal emergency request to a business to
voluntarily hand over information until a more formal NSL can be
issued to cover the request.
For example, the FBI reviewed the circumstances around more than 4,000
phone numbers it obtained through NSLs to determine if proper legal
process was used to obtain them. If the review team couldn’t find
documentation that proper legal process was followed or if the process
was insufficient, but the team determined the phone number was
relevant to a national security investigation, the agency issued a
corrective NSL for the data. If not, then the agency purged the
collected data from its database.
The DoJ report to Congress only briefly discusses FISA applications
for electronic surveillance and physical surveillance related to
foreign intelligence investigations. According to the document,
authorities submitted 2,082 so-called “FISA applications” to the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court last year.
But the court, which evaluates such requests, approved 2,083 FISA
applications in 2008 — the discrepancy is because two applications
submitted in 2007 were approved in 2008 and are counted in 2008
figures. The court rejected one application in 2008 and made
unspecified “substantive modifications” to two others.
By contrast, in 2007, the court approved 2,370 FISA applications,
denied three and part of a fourth application, and modified 86
applications.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list