[Infowarrior] - Secret war on web crooks revealed
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Wed Jun 17 13:24:14 UTC 2009
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0457bd68-5945-11de-80b3-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
Secret war on web crooks revealed
By Maija Palmer
Published: June 15 2009 03:00 | Last updated: June 15 2009 03:00
The people who run the world's internet systems are a rather secretive
bunch.
Three times a year, senior technical officers from companies such as
Google, Yahoo, AT&T, Comcast and Verizon meet to discuss ways of
stopping the internet from being swamped by rising levels of spam,
viruses and hacking attacks by organised criminals. They do not
generally like discussing these meetings.
"Some people might get nervous if they knew all the things we talked
about," said Michael O'Rierdan, chairman of the Messaging Anti-Abuse
Working Group (MAAWG). "Its our job to make the internet safe, but we
don't want to put people off using the web."
They are also worried about being targeted by the cyber-criminals they
are trying to thwart.
Most of the spam and hacking on the internet is run by organised crime
rings. There is an underground economy that hacks into computers,
sells stolen identities and orchestrates the sending of spam e-mails
about everything from fake Viagra pills to banking scams. There is a
lot of money at stake in keeping these operations running.
"We get threats every day," said Larry, chief technical officer of
Spamhaus, a non-profit organisation that exposes spammers. He prefers
not to reveal his surname. "In the US it is people bringing lawsuits
against us. And then there are organised criminals in Russia and
Ukraine, who use different methods."
Steve Linford, the organisation's founder, has been advised by police
not to open unexpected packages arriving at his home.
MAAWG meetings are also places to discuss some of the controversial
measures that internet companies need to take in the fight against
spam, such as blocking some types of e-mail traffic. This measure sits
awkwardly with civil liberties bodies.
The 270 delegates from 19 countries who met at Amsterdam's venerable
Hotel Krasnapolsky last week were far from the usual, suit-wearing
conference crowd. An eclectic mix of tattoos, ponytails, high-waisted
trousers and backpacks indicated that these were true operations
people who work in the bowels of the network.
Membership is strictly vetted and journalists are not normally invited
to attend, but MAAWG has started to lift its veil a little. There is a
growing feeling that the industry must reach out to consumers and get
them to help fight cyber-crime.
In 2008, 349.6bn spam messages were sent across the internet,
according to Symantec, the internet security company. Spam accounts
for an average of almost 94 per cent of all e-mail messages.
Nearly 90 per cent of spam is sent from computers that have been
hacked into and are being remotely programmed to send out spam.
More than 9.4m computers have been hijacked in this way and their
owners are usually entirely unaware it is going on. It will be
impossible to clean up these machines without talking to consumers.
"Sometimes we want people to know what we are doing, so they can yell
at the politicians to give us more help," said Jerry Upton, executive
director of MAAWG.
There is a rising sense of crisis among internet companies about the
cost of spam. Few are willing to quantify how much they have to spend
to fight spam, but Mr O'Rierdan estimated that big internet service
providers employ five to 10 staff just to look at spam. In addition
they must buy spare servers, routers and other equipment to cope with
the volumes of junk mail, buy spam-filtering software and run support
centres for their customers.
Viriya Upatising, chief technical officer of True Internet, a Thai
internet service provider, said junk mail was a crippling cost for the
company because it was paying to send the unwanted data across
undersea cable connections to destinations such as the US and Europe.
"The cost of bandwidth is expensive in Asia," Mr Upatising said. "It
costs us $250 per megabit per month to send data internationally."
The company put in place a draconian system that prevents suspected
spammers from using its network. The measures have cut unwanted
messages from 3.5m a day to a more manageable 250,000.
"We are all sharing these costs," said Patrick Peterson, chief
technology officer at Ironport Systems, Cisco's e-mail security arm.
"Spam is a stealth tax on consumers. ISPs have to pay for the spam,
for the extra bandwidth, for equipment, and they are forced to put up
their prices for consumers."
There is a fear among internet security professionals that they might
be losing the battle to cyber-criminals. This may also be why they now
want the public to know more about what they do, to show they have at
least tried.
"I don't know if we can control it," said Dave Crocker, one of the
early pioneers of e-mail and now a senior technical adviser to MAAWG.
He added: "It is an arms race. We are getting better at filtering out
rogue messages but every day the criminals get better too, and they
are better organised and more aggressive."
Keywords: the dark side of the web
* Spam: Unsolicited electronic messages, most commonly e-mail, but
also increasingly common in instant messaging, blogs and mobile phone
messages. The first e-mail spam is believed to have been sent in 1978.
* Malware: Malicious software designed to infiltrate or damage a
computer system without the owners' consent. Symantec, the internet
security company, has estimated there is now more malware released
each year than legitimate software programs. There are many different
types of malware, including viruses, worms and Trojan horses.
* Phishing : The fraudulent attempt to acquire sensitive information
such as passwords, bank account details and credit card numbers.
Typically it is in the form of an e-mail that directs people to a fake
website - that looks like the legitimate site of a bank or other
trusted organisation - where people are asked to enter personal details.
* Botnets: A network of computers that have been hacked and are being
remotely controlled by cyber-criminals. Typically they are used to
send out spam messages or viruses in large numbers. Most users will be
unaware if their computer has been infiltrated and added to a botnet.
Symantec estimated there were more than 9.4m machines hijacked in this
way in 2008.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list