[Infowarrior] - The NSA wiretapping story nobody wanted

[Richard Forno]

The NSA wiretapping story nobody wanted
Whistleblower Mark Klein tells in his new book of how he was ignored.  
He spoke with IDG News.
Robert McMillan

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135645/The_NSA_wiretapping_story_nobody_wanted

July 17, 2009 (IDG News Service) They sometimes call national security  
the third rail of politics. Touch it and, politically, you're dead.
The cliché doesn't seem far off the mark after reading Mark Klein's  
new book, "Wiring up the Big Brother Machine ... and Fighting It."  
It's an account of his experiences as the whistleblower who exposed a  
secret room at a Folsom Street facility in San Francisco that was  
apparently used to monitor the Internet communications of ordinary  
Americans.

Klein, 64, was a retired AT&T communications technician in December  
2005, when he read the New York Times story that blew the lid off the  
Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program. Secretly  
authorized in 2002, the program lets the U.S. National Security Agency  
(NSA) monitor telephone conversations and e-mail messages of people  
inside the U.S. to identify suspected terrorists. Klein knew right  
away that he had proof -- documents from his time at AT&T -- that  
could provide a snapshot of how the program was siphoning data off of  
the AT&T network in San Francisco.

Amazingly, however, nobody wanted to hear his story. In his book he  
talks about meetings with reporters and privacy groups that went  
nowhere until a fateful January 20, 2006, meeting with Kevin Bankston  
of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). Bankston was preparing a  
lawsuit that he hoped would put a stop to the wiretap program, and  
Klein was just the kind of witness the EFF was looking for.

With the EFF on board, Klein was briefly a media celebrity -- the man  
who had the guts to expose the NSA's secret wiretapping program. In  
his book he provides the documents and the stories that illustrate how  
all of this transpired.

Klein has been politically active since the 1960s, when he protested  
the Vietnam war. "I came to view the government with great suspicion  
like a lot of people back then and I still do," he said in an  
interview he granted the IDG News service on Friday. "I guess that  
sort of laid the groundwork for my later experience, because I didn't  
trust the government to begin with."

Today he lives in the San Francisco Bay Area with his wife, Linda, and  
his two dogs. He self-published his book last week.

Related Story
Obama administration defends Bush wiretapping
Following is an edited transcript of the interview.

IDG News Service: By some estimates there are 15 to 20 of these secret  
wiretapping rooms across the country. You're the only AT&T employee  
who has come forward and talked about them in detail. Why?

Mark Klein: Fear. First of all it was a scary time. It still is a  
scary time, but during the Bush years it was sort of a witch hunt  
atmosphere and people were afraid. People are afraid of losing their  
jobs, and it's a rule of thumb that if you become a whistleblower  
you'll probably lose your job. And if you have a security clearance,  
you not only lose your job, but you probably will be prosecuted by the  
government. The Bush administration made that very clear in statements  
they made over and over again: 'Anybody who reveals anything about our  
secret programs will be prosecuted and we are running investigations  
to find out who leaked this to the New York Times.' Well that puts a  
fear in people.

IDGNS: Have you heard from other AT&T employees who told you that they  
knew of these activities?

Klein: I haven't tried to get in contact with people I knew at AT&T  
for this very reason. I didn't want to jeopardize their livelihood.

IDGNS: In your book you describe how a meeting with your lawyer was  
videotaped to preserve evidence in case you "disappeared." How scared  
were you?

Klein: I was very worried. The Bush administration was capable of very  
crazy things and illegal things. I knew they were doing torture. And I  
knew they had taken into custody and jailed people who were citizens  
of the United States ... and just thrown them away in a brig with no  
trial and no charges. So I didn't think it was beyond the possibility  
that they'd do the same to me. Maybe I was getting a little paranoid  
in hindsight, but hindsight is cheap.

I was most worried at the time when the LA Times was killing my story,  
but at the same time the LA Times showed it to the government. Then I  
really was panicking because that meant that the government knew  
everything and probably knew my name, but I didn't have any publicity.

IDGNS: The media merit a full chapter (entitled: 'Going Public vs.  
Media Chickens') in your book. What happened there?

Klein: The LA Times was particularly egregious because they were  
planning a front-page spread. They were the first entity I'd given all  
the documents to. Then they talked to the government about it, and it  
turned out they were talking to not only the NSA director, but the  
director of national intelligence, who was John Negroponte at the  
time. So that meant the government knew it. And then a few weeks later  
the LA Times killed the story. So the only thing you can read into is  
that basically the government squashed the story. [The LA Times'  
editor in early 2006, Dean Baquet, said the government had nothing to  
do with the decision. 'We did not have a story, that we could not  
figure out what was going on,' he told ABC News -- ed.]

IDGNS: How long did they have the story?

Klein: I started dealing with them in late January 2006, and in  
February they showed it to the government, and then they started  
wobbling. By the end of March 2006, they officially told me the story  
was killed.

IDGNS: Did they cover it in April, after it became public?

Klein: No that was funny. After it finally hit the news everywhere  
else, The LA Times didn't run with the stuff I'd given them. They'd  
squashed the whole thing.

IDGNS: A lot of people you might have expected to be interested in  
this story weren't interested initially. In the book, you talk about  
going to EPIC [the Electronic Privacy Information Center] and getting  
nowhere; you talk about the media and you also talk about Congress.  
You never testified before Congress.

Klein: This book has several aspects. The first aspect is the spying  
itself and the technical apparatus; another aspect is the role of the  
media and how the media has basically functioned as a propaganda  
apparatus for the government, more or less willingly. Part of the book  
is about the struggle to make the media cover this story. And the  
third part of this story is about Congress. It was a struggle, a  
struggle which failed I might add, to get Congress to investigate and  
do something about this. Congress ran away from me. They didn't want  
to touch me with a 10-foot pole, starting with my own senator, Dianne  
Feinstein, who was a key member of both the Intelligence Committee in  
the Senate and the Judiciary Committee. She was one of the first  
legislators I tried to contact in February 2006. I was given the  
number of her chief attorney in Washington, and he first was very  
interested. He talked to me on the phone and asked me a bunch of  
detailed questions and told me he'd get back to me. And then I never  
heard from him again.

IDGNS: Why do you think you had trouble getting Congress interested?

Klein: With the Republicans, it's obvious why they didn't want to deal  
with it. Their administration was responsible for the whole illegal  
spying operation. The first layer of the Democratic party leadership,  
it turns out, had been knowledgeable and briefed on this program and  
was complicit, in my view.

IDGNS: What do you think you've accomplished by coming forward with  
these documents?

Klein: My main accomplishment is to let everybody know about what  
exactly the government is doing to people. How the government in  
detail is screwing over people's privacy and trampling over the  
Constitution and the Fourth Amendment, and lay out in great detail how  
everybody's personal lives are being delved into by the government and  
stored in secret databases for future reference.