[Infowarrior] - Revenge on the UK's arch-snooper
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Mon Feb 23 04:09:02 UTC 2009
What a perfect revenge on the arch snooper
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/22/jacqui-smith-expenses-inquiry
o Carole Cadwalladr
o The Observer, Sunday 22 February 2009
Hardly anyone actually shoots themselves in the foot or literally gets
egg on their face, so it was a real pleasure last week, in so many
ways, to witness Jacqui Smith being hoist with her own petard.
A petard was, in the original French, an explosion of intestinal gas
which, in turn, gave its name to a small bomb, such as the one that
erupted across the papers last week, when the neighbours of her
sister's house in Peckham, south London, came forward and told the
press that she was only there a couple of days a week.
Because, in the small matter of whether she was right to pocket
£116,000 of additional expenses by claiming that the back bedroom she
rents off sister is her "main home", as opposed to the house she owns
in her constituency in Redditch where her husband and children happen
to live, this turns out to be critical testimony.
Standards Commissioner John Lyon twice turned down requests to
investigate the matter. It was only when some neighbours, Dominic and
Jessica Taplin, wrote to him and repeated the claims they made to a
newspaper, that she is there rather less than the four nights a week
that she claims, that he agreed to open an inquiry.
It's this that's the real beauty of the story. Residents on the online
East Dulwich forum (East Dulwich being what you call Peckham if you
happen to live there) declared themselves outraged at the behaviour of
the neighbours, with words like "snitch", "curtain-twitchers",
"grassers" and "narks" being bandied about (apparently "Dominic and
Jessica Taplin represent all that's worst about the new smug arriviste
elements of East Dulwich"). This is the world that Jacqui Smith has
created. The only shame is that they didn't capture her on CCTV.
If you want to rat out your neighbours, allow the home secretary to
enumerate the ways. Do you know someone who claims more from the state
than they're entitled to? Who is "picking the pockets of law-abiding
taxpayers"? Not politicians over-egging their allowances, obviously,
but "benefit thieves". If so, call 0800 854 440 now. "We're closing in
with hidden cameras. We're closing in with every means at our disposal."
Do they own more than one mobile phone? Then call 0800 789 321.
"Terrorists need communication. They often collect and use many pay-as-
you-go mobile phones, as well as swapping Sim cards and handsets."
No mobile phones? What about if they're "hanging around"? Or, as the
Home Office-funded radio advertisement puts it: "How can you tell if
they're a normal everyday person or a terrorist? The answer is that
you don't have to. If you call the confidential Anti-Terrorist Hotline
on 0800 789 321, the specialist officers you speak to will analyse the
information. They'll decide if and how to follow it up. You don't have
to be sure. If you suspect it, report it."
It's such a lovely turn of phrase, that. If you suspect it, report it.
Don't wait for evidence. Or question your own prejudices. If someone's
not a "normal everyday person" exactly like you, then they could well
be a member of al-Qaida. What flawless logic that is. We're already
described as "a surveillance state" by Privacy International, one in
five of all CCTV cameras ever made are currently in Britain, and Smith
is drawing up plans to intercept every phone call we make and every
email we send. The Taplins weren't snitches - they were perfect
citizens in her New Model Army. And while her critics invoke the
analogy of the Stasi, a more accurate comparison would be with a
suburb in Connecticut, circa 1961.
Because for all its period atmosphere with Kate Winslet in a little
pill-box hat, Revolutionary Road, the film for which she may or may
not win an Oscar tonight, feels a curiously contemporary affair. Not
just for its critique of capitalism, the profound sense of emptiness
that afflicts the characters despite, or maybe because of, their
material comforts, but because of the hermetic vision of suburbia it
offers: a conformity of living, of beliefs, aspirations and behaviour
that is rigorously policed by family, friends and neighbours. If you
suspect it, report it. And if you live by the sword, Jacqui, you must
be prepared to die by it too.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list