[Infowarrior] - ACTA hypocrascy
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Sun Feb 1 17:43:45 UTC 2009
Remember ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement? Here's the US
response to FOIA requests to see the deliberation papers, drafts,
documents, and proposed treaty languages.....IMHO it's things like
this that give "pirates" or "hackers" the moral high ground in this
issue when they "circumvent" or "disclose" IP protection schemes made
under such dubious claims of secrecy. ---rf
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090129/1955073576.shtml
< - >
Apparently the US Trade Representative is refusing to release most of
the documents requested under the FOIA claiming (I kid you not) that
to release such documents could "implicate national security or expose
the USTR's deliberative processes."
But, of course, the USTR had no problem at all sharing all this info
with entertainment industry lobbyists. In the few documents that were
released, it turns out that the USTR met privately with
representatives of various "anti-piracy" lobbying groups multiple
times in 2008 -- without bothering to consult with the folks who these
laws would actually impact. In other words, they're getting one side
of the story. Even worse, those lobbyists have been called out,
repeatedly -- by the US government, no less -- for outright
fabrications concerning the impact of piracy and counterfeiting. So
why is the USTR only relying on them for determining how this trade
agreement will work? And why is there no effort to make these
negotiations more public so that all stakeholders have a say?
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list