[Infowarrior] - OT: 2010: Welcome to Orwell’s World
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Thu Dec 31 16:39:09 UTC 2009
2010: Welcome to Orwell’s World
by John Pilger, December 31, 2009
http://original.antiwar.com/pilger/2009/12/30/2010-welcome-to-orwells-world/
In Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell described a superstate called
Oceania, whose language of war inverted lies that "passed into history
and became truth. ‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan,
‘controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.’"
Barack Obama is the leader of a contemporary Oceania. In two speeches
at the close of the decade, the Nobel Peace Prize winner affirmed that
peace was no longer peace, but rather a permanent war that "extends
well beyond Afghanistan and Pakistan" to "disorderly regions and
diffuse enemies." He called this "global security" and invited our
gratitude. To the people of Afghanistan, which America has invaded and
occupied, he said wittily: "We have no interest in occupying your
country."
In Oceania, truth and lies are indivisible. According to Obama, the
American attack on Afghanistan in 2001 was authorized by the United
Nations Security Council. There was no UN authority. He said the "the
world" supported the invasion in the wake of 9/11 when, in truth, all
but three of 37 countries surveyed by Gallup expressed overwhelming
opposition. He said that America invaded Afghanistan "only after the
Taliban refused to turn over [Osama] bin Laden." In 2001, the Taliban
tried three times to hand over bin Laden for trial, reported
Pakistan’s military regime, and were ignored. Even Obama’s
mystification of 9/11 as justification for his war is false. More than
two months before the Twin Towers were attacked, the Pakistani foreign
minister, Niaz Naik, was told by the Bush administration that an
American military assault would take place by mid-October. The Taliban
regime in Kabul, which the Clinton administration had secretly
supported, was no longer regarded as "stable" enough to ensure
America’s control over oil and gas pipelines to the Caspian Sea. It
had to go.
Obama’s most audacious lie is that Afghanistan today is a "safe haven"
for al-Qaeda’s attacks on the West. His own national security adviser,
General James Jones, said in October that there were "fewer than 100"
al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. According to US intelligence, 90 percent of
the Taliban are hardly Taliban at all, but "a tribal localized
insurgency [who] see themselves as opposing the US because it is an
occupying power." The war is a fraud. Only the terminally gormless
remain true to the Obama brand of "world peace."
Beneath the surface, however, there is serious purpose. Under the
disturbing General Stanley McChrystal, who gained distinction for his
assassination squads in Iraq, the occupation of one of the most
impoverished countries is a model for those "disorderly regions" of
the world still beyond Oceania’s reach. This is known as COIN, or
counter-insurgency network, which draws together the military, aid
organizations, psychologists, anthropologists, the media, and public
relations hirelings. Covered in jargon about winning hearts and
minds, its aim is to pit one ethnic group against another and incite
civil war: Tajiks and Uzbeks against Pashtuns.
The Americans did this in Iraq and destroyed a multi-ethnic society.
They bribed and built walls between communities who had once inter-
married, ethnically cleansing the Sunni and driving millions out of
the country. The embedded media reported this as "peace," and American
academics bought by Washington and "security experts" briefed by the
Pentagon appeared on the BBC to spread the good news. As in Nineteen
Eighty-Four, the opposite was true.
Something similar is planned for Afghanistan. People are to be forced
into "target areas" controlled by warlords bankrolled by the Americans
and the opium trade. That these warlords are infamous for their
barbarism is irrelevant. "We can live with that," a Clinton-era
diplomat said of the persecution of women in a "stable" Taliban-run
Afghanistan. Favored western relief agencies, engineers, and
agricultural specialists will attend to the "humanitarian crisis" and
so "secure" the subjugated tribal lands.
That is the theory. It worked after a fashion in Yugoslavia where the
ethnic-sectarian partition wiped out a once peaceful society, but it
failed in Vietnam where the CIA’s "strategic hamlet program" was
designed to corral and divide the southern population and so defeat
the Viet Cong — the Americans’ catch-all term for the resistance,
similar to "Taliban."
Behind much of this are the Israelis, who have long advised the
Americans in both the Iraq and Afghanistan adventures. Ethnic
cleansing, wall-building, checkpoints, collective punishment, and
constant surveillance – these are claimed as Israeli innovations that
have succeeded in stealing most of Palestine from its native people.
And yet for all their suffering, the Palestinians have not been
divided irrevocably and they endure as a nation against all odds.
The most telling forerunners of the Obama Plan, which the Nobel Peace
Prize winner and his strange general and his PR men prefer we forget,
are those that failed in Afghanistan itself. The British in the 19th
century and the Soviets in the 20th century attempted to conquer that
wild country by ethnic cleansing and were seen off, though after
terrible bloodshed. Imperial cemeteries are their memorials. People
power, sometimes baffling, often heroic, remains the seed beneath the
snow, and invaders fear it.
"It was curious," wrote Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four, "to think that
the sky was the same for everybody, in Eurasia or Eastasia as well as
here. And the people under the sky were also very much the same,
everywhere, all over the world … people ignorant of one another’s
existence, held apart by walls of hatred and lies, and yet almost
exactly the same people who … were storing up in their hearts and
bellies and muscles the power that would one day overturn the world."
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list