[Infowarrior] - Senate panel approves DoJ as Hollywood copyright cops
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Fri Sep 12 13:02:01 UTC 2008
Senate Panel Approves Bill To Make The Justice Dep't Hollywood's
Private Police Force
We were just talking about how a huge number of public interest groups
had explained to the Senate why the new Enforcement of Intellectual
Property Rights Act was a such terrible idea since it would add a
Copyright Czar in the White House and let the FBI file civil charges
against people caught infringing on copyrights. After all, there's
simply no logical explanation for why the FBI should be propping up
the obsolete business model of an industry that refuses to change with
the market.
However, it appears that public interest groups don't fund campaigns
like the entertainment industry does. The Senate Judiciary Committee
has gone ahead and approved moving the bill forward by a 14-4 margin,
basically handing over Justice Department resources to Hollywood to
protect its business model with no real justification.
The bill's sponsor, Sen. Patrick Leahy's explanation is pretty
stunning in its ignorance:
"We all know that intellectual property makes up some of the most
valuable, and most vulnerable, property we have. We need to do more to
protect it from theft and abuse if we hope to continue being a world
leader in innovation."
Can someone send him a copy of Against Intellectual Monopoly so he can
understand how nearly every part of that sentence is wrong. First off,
intellectual property, despite the name, is not "property" at all.
It's also not "vulnerable" except if you mean that there are better
business models out there for dealing with. He gives no convincing
reason why we should "protect" it, other than a factually untrue
statement about "theft," when infringement and theft are two totally
different things and should be dealt with in two totally different
ways. Finally, studies have shown that the more "protected" IP is, the
less innovation results, so his final clause is simply backwards. This
bill will serve to limit American innovation, and open up more foreign
innovation instead. But, as long as it means the RIAA doesn't need to
innovate...
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080911/1804242241.shtml
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list