[Infowarrior] - Google Earth helps yet worries government
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Sat Nov 8 03:35:12 UTC 2008
Google Earth helps yet worries government
By Peter Eisler, USA TODAY
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/surveillance/2008-11-06-googleearth_N.htm
WASHINGTON — The secretive National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency is
rushing to get the latest, high-definition satellite photos of
Afghanistan into the hands of U.S. ground troops as they ramp up
operations in the country's tangled terrain.
The NGA analysts aren't tapping the government's huge network of
highly classified spy satellites; they're getting the pictures from
commercial vendors. That's the same stuff pretty much anyone can get,
either through free, online programs, such as Google Earth, or by
buying it from the same companies supplying Uncle Sam.
It's a remarkable turn, given the warnings that security experts in
the USA and worldwide raised a few years ago about giving the entire
planet — terrorists and rogue states included — access to high-
resolution satellite photos once available only to superpowers.
Last month, the most powerful commercial satellite in history sent its
first pictures back to Earth, and another with similar capabilities is
set for launch in mid-2009. The imagery provided by those and other
commercial satellites has transformed global security in fundamental
ways, forcing even the most powerful nations to hide facilities and
activities that are visible not only to rival nations, but even to
their own citizens.
Although no one disputes that commercial imagery poses threats, it has
been embraced in ways few predicted.
"It's created a lot of opportunities to do things we couldn't do with
(classified) imagery," says Jack Hild, a deputy director at NGA, which
provides imagery and mapping for defense and homeland security
operations.
Pictures from government satellites are better than commercial photos,
but how much better is a secret. Only people with security clearances
generally are allowed to see them. Using commercial products,
intelligence agencies can provide imagery for combat troops, which
wasn't possible before because of the risk of it reaching enemy hands
and even international coalition partners.
Federal agencies use commercial imagery to guide emergency response
and inform the public during natural disasters, such as this year's
Hurricane Ike. It's also used by government scientists to monitor
glacial melting and drought effects in the Farm Belt.
When commercial satellite photos first hit the market, "the gut
reaction was, 'We can't allow this imagery to be out there because
someone might do us harm with it,' " Hild says. "Are there still bad
things that people can do with commercial imagery? Absolutely … but we
think the benefits far outweigh the risks."
Other nations share the sentiment. U.S. and foreign government
contracts provide critical income for commercial imagery companies,
such as Digital Globe and GeoEye — both of which supply photos for
Google Earth.
"Most of our revenue (is) from governments," says Mark Brender, vice
president of GeoEye, which got half its 2007 revenue from the U.S.
government and 35% from foreign governments. "They have a core
competency in understanding how to use this technology — and a
national security imperative to do so."
In August 2006, the Islamic Army in Iraq circulated an instructional
video on how to aim rockets at U.S. military sites using Google Earth.
Posted on a jihadist website, the video showed a computer using the
program to zoom in for close-up views of buildings at Iraq's Rasheed
Airport, according to an unclassified U.S. intelligence report
obtained by USA TODAY. The segment ended with the caption, "Islamic
Army in Iraq/The Military Engineering Unit — Preparations for Rocket
Attack."
The video appeared to fulfill the dire predictions raised by security
experts in the USA and across the globe when Google began offering
free Internet access to worldwide satellite imagery in 2005. Officials
in countries as diverse as Australia, India, Israel and the
Netherlands complained publicly that it would be a boon to terrorists
and hostile states, especially since the pictures often provide a
site's map coordinates.
Indeed, some terrorist attacks have been planned with the help of
Google Earth, including an event in 2006 in which terrorists used car
bombs in an unsuccessful effort to destroy oil facilities in Yemen,
according to Yemeni press reports. Images from Google Earth and other
commercial sources have been found in safe houses used by al-Qaeda and
other terror groups, according to the Pentagon.
Many security experts say commercial imagery does little to enhance
the capabilities of such organizations.
"You can get the same (scouting) information just by walking around"
with a map and a GPS device, says John Pike, director of
GlobalSecurity.org, a research organization specializing in defense
and intelligence policy. The imagery "may give someone precise
coordinates (for a target), but they need precise weapons … and their
ability to target discrete parts of a particular site is pretty
limited. People who think this gives you magical powers watch too many
Tom Clancy movies."
Safeguards
Nonetheless, the world's governments have taken a variety of steps in
response to the emergence of Google Earth and other commercial imagery
sources, according to a confidential report issued in July by the
CIA's Open Source Center and made public by the Federation of American
Scientists. Among them:
•Negotiation. Some nations have asked Google and other companies to
keep certain images off the market, the report says. For example,
Google Earth uses older imagery of parts of Iraq based on British
concerns about exposing military sites. Some commercial imagery
providers -- typically those providing pictures from planes, not
satellites -- blur sensitive images before they are provided to
Google, usually in accordance with local law or at the request of
local authorities.
•Bans. China has barred websites selling "unapproved" commercial
imagery, according to the report. In 2006, Bahrain officials banned
Google Earth, but the CIA report notes that the move may have been
mainly to "prevent exposure of elaborate residences and land holdings
of the country's rich."
•Buying in. Several countries, such as China and Thailand, are getting
into the satellite imagery business themselves, and India sells its
spy photos commercially, the report says. Many countries that lack
their own satellite capability have become enthusiastic purchasers of
commercial imagery to meet intelligence and security needs.
•Evasion. Many countries have stepped up efforts to conceal sensitive
facilities, either by putting them underground or camouflaging them,
the report says. Others, such as India, have improved their ability to
discern when satellites pass overhead, which allows them to conduct
sensitive military activities when cameras aren't watching.
"We actively engage with organizations and governments … to strike a
balance between their security concerns and the needs of the end
user," says Chikai Ohazama, Google Earth's product management
director. Sensitive sites often are obscured by satellite operators
before Google even gets the imagery, he adds. It often doesn't matter
"because the imagery already is available from other places."
Newer satellites
The number of sources for satellite imagery continues to grow, fueled
not only by government customers in the USA and worldwide, but by an
explosion in public usage.
This month, GeoEye launched the most advanced commercial satellite yet
— able to distinguish home plate on a baseball field — and the NGA
paid half the $475 million cost. Digital Globe will launch a satellite
with similar resolution and other new capabilities next year on its
own dime.
The use of commercial imagery relieves some of the burden on the U.S.
government's classified satellite network, says Rick Oborn, spokesman
at the National Reconnaissance Office, which runs the system.
"We're oversubscribed," Oborn says, noting that intelligence and
security missions get priority and often need the higher resolution
and quicker returns offered by the government's own satellites.
"Anytime the broader area stuff can be taken commercially, so much the
better."
The appetite for commercial imagery from the general public continues
to grow as more people realize the technology has uses far beyond
picking out your home on Google Earth.
Non-governmental organizations have used commercial imagery to show
devastating attacks on villages in Darfur by the Janjaweed militia.
Security experts have used it to show development of new missile bases
in North Korea. Environmentalists have used it to document effects of
global warming.
"In a way, those sort of things also have a lot to do with national
security," says Steven Aftergood, an intelligence expert at the
Federation of American Scientists. "It's an extraordinary tool (for)
bringing transparency to government. … And it's here to stay."
Find this article at:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/surveillance/2008-11-06-googleearth_N.htm
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list