[Infowarrior] - CCTV boom has failed to slash crime, say police
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue May 6 20:13:30 UTC 2008
CCTV boom has failed to slash crime, say police
* Owen Bowcott
* The Guardian,
* Tuesday May 6 2008
* Article history
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/may/06/ukcrime1/print
This article appeared in the Guardian on Tuesday May 06 2008 on p1 of
the Top stories section. It was last updated at 13:35 on May 06 2008.
Massive investment in CCTV cameras to prevent crime in the UK has
failed to have a significant impact, despite billions of pounds spent
on the new technology, a senior police officer piloting a new database
has warned. Only 3% of street robberies in London were solved using
CCTV images, despite the fact that Britain has more security cameras
than any other country in Europe.
The warning comes from the head of the Visual Images, Identifications
and Detections Office (Viido) at New Scotland Yard as the force
launches a series of initiatives to try to boost conviction rates
using CCTV evidence. They include:
· A new database of images which is expected to use technology
developed by the sports advertising industry to track and identify
offenders.
· Putting images of suspects in muggings, rape and robbery cases out
on the internet from next month.
· Building a national CCTV database, incorporating pictures of
convicted offenders as well as unidentified suspects. The plans for
this have been drawn up, but are on hold while the technology required
to carry out automated searches is refined.
Link to this audio
Owen Bowcott on why CCTV is catching few criminals
Use of CCTV images for court evidence has so far been very poor,
according to Detective Chief Inspector Mick Neville, the officer in
charge of the Metropolitan police unit. "CCTV was originally seen as a
preventative measure," Neville told the Security Document World
Conference in London. "Billions of pounds has been spent on kit, but
no thought has gone into how the police are going to use the images
and how they will be used in court. It's been an utter fiasco: only 3%
of crimes were solved by CCTV. There's no fear of CCTV. Why don't
people fear it? [They think] the cameras are not working."
More training was needed for officers, he said. Often they do not want
to find CCTV images "because it's hard work". Sometimes the police did
not bother inquiring beyond local councils to find out whether CCTV
cameras monitored a particular street incident.
"CCTV operators need feedback. If you call them back, they feel valued
and are more helpful. We want to develop a career path for CCTV
[police] inquirers."
The Viido unit is beginning to establish a London-wide database of
images of suspects that are cross-referenced by written descriptions.
Interest in the technology has been enhanced by recent police work, in
which officers back-tracked through video tapes to pick out terrorist
suspects. In districts where the Viido scheme is working, CCTV is now
helping police in 15-20% of street robberies.
"We are [beginning] to collate images from across London," Neville
said. "This has got to be balanced against any Big Brother concerns,
with safeguards. The images are from thefts, robberies and more
serious crimes. Possibly the [database] could be national in future."
The unit is now investigating whether it can use software - developed
to track advertising during televised football games - to follow
distinctive brand logos on the clothing of unidentified suspects.
"Sometimes you are looking for a picture, for example, of someone with
a red top and a green dragon on it," he explained. "That technology
could be used to track logos." By back-tracking, officers have often
found earlier pictures, for example, of suspects with their hoods
down, in which they can be identified.
"We are also going to start putting out [pictures] on the internet, on
the Met police website, asking 'who is this guy?'. If criminals see
that CCTV works they are less likely to commit crimes."
Cheshire deputy chief constable Graham Gerrard, who chairs the CCTV
working group of the Association of Chief Police Officers, told the
Guardian, that it made no sense to have a national DNA and fingerprint
database, but to have to approach 43 separate forces for images of
suspects and offenders. A scheme called the Facial Identification
National Database (Find), which began collecting offenders' images
from their prison pictures and elsewhere, has been put on hold.
He said that there were discussions with biometric companies "on a
regular basis" about developing the technology to search digitised
databases and match suspects' images with known offenders. "Sometimes
when they put their [equipment] in operational practice, it's not as
wonderful as they said it would be, " he said. "I suspect [Find] has
been put on hold until the technology matures. Before you can digitise
every offender's image you have to make sure the lighting is right and
it's a good picture. It's a major project. We are still some way from
a national database. There are still ethical and technical issues to
consider."
Asked about the development of a CCTV database, the office of the UK's
information commissioner, Richard Thomas, said: "CCTV can play an
important role in helping to prevent and detect crime. However we
would expect adequate safeguards to be put in place to ensure the
images are only used for crime detection purposes, stored securely and
that access to images is restricted to authorised individuals. We
would have concerns if CCTV images of individuals going about their
daily lives were retained as part of the initiative."
The charity Victim's Voice, which supports relatives of those who have
been murdered, said it supported more effective use of CCTV systems.
"Our view is that anything that helps get criminals off the street and
prevents crime is good," said Ed Usher, one of the organisation's
trustees. "If handled properly it can be a superb preventative tool."
* Print thisPrintable version
* Send to a friendSend to a friend
* Share thisShare
* Clip thisClip
* Contact usContact us
* Resize font larger | smaller
Share
Close
* Digg
* reddit
* Google Bookmarks
* Yahoo! My Web
* del.icio.us
* StumbleUpon
* Newsvine
* livejournal
* Facebook
* BlinkList
Email
Close
Recipient's email address
Your name
Add a note (optional)
Contact us
Close
* Report errors or inaccuracies: reader at guardian.co.uk
* Letters for publication should be sent to: letters at guardian.co.uk
* If you need help using the site: userhelp at guardian.co.uk
* Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
+44 (0)20 7278 2332
*
o Advertising guide
o License/buy our content
UK news
* Crime ·
* Civil liberties
* Print thisPrintable version
* Send to a friendSend to a friend
* Share thisShare
* Clip thisClip
* Contact usContact us
* Article historyArticle history
About this article
Close
This article appeared in the Guardian on Tuesday May 06 2008 on
p1 of the Top stories section. It was last updated at 13:35 on May 06
2008.
Share
Close
* Digg
* reddit
* Google Bookmarks
* Yahoo! My Web
* del.icio.us
* StumbleUpon
* Newsvine
* livejournal
* Facebook
* BlinkList
Email
Close
Recipient's email address
Your name
Add a note (optional)
Contact us
Close
* Report errors or inaccuracies: reader at guardian.co.uk
* Letters for publication should be sent to: letters at guardian.co.uk
* If you need help using the site: userhelp at guardian.co.uk
* Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard:
+44 (0)20 7278 2332
*
o Advertising guide
o License/buy our content
Latest news on guardian.co.uk
Last updated 11 minutes ago
*
News
Cyclone death toll rises to 22,000 as Burma seeks aid
*
UK news
Guantánamo Briton sues UK over 'torture evidence'
*
Sponsored features
*
*
Guardian Jobs
Browse all jobs
* License/buy our content |
* Privacy policy |
* Terms & conditions |
* Advertising guide |
* Accessibility |
* A-Z index |
* Inside guardian.co.uk |
* About guardian.co.uk |
* Join our dating site today
* guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2008
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list