[Infowarrior] - Security Clearance 'Question 21' Eliminated
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue May 6 00:13:20 UTC 2008
Security Clearance 'Question 21' Eliminated
By Sharon Weinberger EmailMay 02, 2008 | 11:06:09 AMCategories: Shhh!!!
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/security-cleara.html
Having been in the past investigated for a security clearance, and
used as a reference for others seeking a security clearance, I can
personally attest to it being a somewhat wacky process (but in the
end, much, much less scary and typically not as intrusive as those
outside the world of security might fear). This week, Defense
Secretary Robert Gates at least made it a tad bit more sane, quite
literally. As the Washington Post reports:
Gates said the security question -- which he referred to as the
"infamous Question 21" -- has been an obstacle to care, and he urged
service members to get help for mental health problems. "You can be
tough and seek help for dealing with these problems," he told reporters.
The change will apply not only to military and civilian employees
of the Defense Department but also to all applicants for security
clearances.
The new policy revises the 21st question on the SF-86
Questionnaire for National Security Positions. The revised form allows
applicants to respond "no" as to whether they have sought mental
health care over the past seven years, if that care was not court-
ordered and was "strictly related to adjustments from service in a
military combat environment."
Previously, military personnel and others applying for the
clearance who had sought treatment for PTSD, anxiety, depression and
other reactions to combat stress had to answer "yes" and provide
details of who conducted the treatment.
About 2.5 million of the 3.1 million defense personnel have
security clearances. Only a small percentage of applicants were denied
clearances for mental health problems, military officials said. They
cited data for 2006 showing that only about 75 out of 800,000
applications were rejected for that reason.
Last year, a report by the Army's inspector general found that
soldiers were hesitant to seek treatment because they worried about
losing their security clearances. "The perception was much more an
issue than the reality of the situation," said Lt. Col. Patrick Ryder,
a Pentagon spokesman.
In other words, Gates' decision removes a question that didn't
substantively add much, if anything, to security, while encouraging
people to get mental health care help they might need. The next big
step could be to reform the security clearance process in a way that
doesn't discourage much needed experts in Arabic language/culture to
work in the world of national security.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list