[Infowarrior] - Useless Compensation for Data Loss Incidents
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Wed Jun 11 11:22:28 UTC 2008
Useless Compensation for Data Loss Incidents
Wed Jun 11 03:38:35 EDT 2008
Apacid, Jericho
http://attrition.org/security/rant/dl-compensation.html
If you have been the victim of a data loss incident, odds are you have
received a letter from the careless organization that lost your
information. These letters always offer apologies and sincere hope
that your identity or personal information isn't abused. The recent
BNY Mellon incident (which now stands at 4.5 million potential
customers affected) resulted in customers receiving such a letter:
Notice that in return for having your personal information lost, they
are offering free credit monitoring for 12 whole months! This
seemingly generous offer has apparently become the standard business
practice for acceptable compensation when your personal information is
treated with carelessness. BNY opted to go with ConsumerInfo.com's
"Triple Alert" credit monitoring product (despite no mention of that
'product' on the consumerinfo.com web page), which watches for changes
to your credit reports from the three national credit reporting
agencies in the United States (Experian, Equifax, TransUnion). If you
are unlucky and get caught up in multiple data loss incidents, you may
receive this "gracious compensation" many times over.
First, why is this type of reactive credit monitoring acceptable
compensation? This seems to be another case of one business following
another and... voila, we have an industry 'standard' that does little
to serve the customer but does everything to serve businesses that
want to look caring and "customer-centric" in the media.
Second, since this is hardly compensating customers, what better
things could the money be used for? If you take Experian at face value
and accept it is a US$60 value, that will pay for a nice steak dinner
and bottle of wine to fuel grumbling about corporate irresponsibility,
which is definitely a better use than redundant 'credit monitoring'
that really does little for the customer. What if the company that
lost that information were required to send each person affected US
$60 in cash instead? Bank of NY Mellon would have to pay out 270
million dollars, Hannaford would have to pay out 252 million, and TD
Ameritrade would have to pay out 378 million. Wouldn't that be good
incentive to implement stronger data security? Instead, businesses get
out cheap by paying pennies on the dollar for ineffective and catch-
ridden 'services' from companies that also profit heavily from having
your information in the first place. If not that, companies should
spend a fraction of those multi-million dollar amounts and pay for the
institution of higher data security and a more thorough method for
auditing their security. Imagine if any of those companies had
budgeted US $100 million on data security the year before the breach.
Third, have you read the fine print to this generous credit
monitoring? The monitoring in question consists of "daily" checks on
your credit report in which they notify you of "key changes". If you
get such a notification and suspect something is wrong, you must file
a police report within 10 days of receiving the e-mail notification,
report the suspected identity theft to their Fraud Resolution
Department within 10 days of receiving the e-mail, place a fraud alert
with Experian, Equifax and TransUnion within 10 days of receiving the
e-mail notification, work with the Fraud Resolution Department to
pursue all sources of reimbursement (so they don't have to pay you the
guaranteed amount) and finally, pay out of pocket if you don't meet
all the criteria on their list in section 4. So if you happen to be on
vacation or without e-mail for 10 days, this monitoring is entirely
worthless as they will do nothing else to proactively protect you from
such abuse. All this for only US $4.95 a month!! Oh, they can also
terminate this offer/agreement at any time at their sole and complete
discretion...
Fourth, does this seem like a huge profit circle and/or conflict of
interest? The companies that are there maintaining your credit history
and score are in turn charging customers for this monitoring. If you
are unlucky and get your information lost, you get this paid service
for free for one year. If not, you pay this company to monitor the
records they keep for suspicious activity because they wouldn't do it
otherwise. They really care about the accuracy and security of your
personal information, promise!
The simple truth is that offering limited credit monitoring for a
heinous act of carelessness is no form of "compensation" to the
affected customers. This desperate attempt to seem generous and caring
is nothing more than a marketing ploy designed to appease customers
that should otherwise be angry and looking to take their business
elsewhere. It's time to expect and demand more from companies that
lose your personal information, whether by theft, poor policies, gross
negligence, or any combination of the above.
Copyright 2008 by Attrition.org. Permission is granted to quote,
reprint or redistribute provided the text is not altered, and
appropriate credit is given, if you are not a credit reporting agency.
Any credit reporting agency, including Experian, Equifax and
TransUnion must obtain licensing to quote, reprint or redistribute
this article.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list