[Infowarrior] - Google Says I.P. Addresses Aren ¹ t Personal

Richard Forno rforno at infowarrior.org
Sat Feb 23 02:57:51 UTC 2008


 February 22, 2008,  5:16 pm
Google Says I.P. Addresses Aren¹t Personal

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/google-says-ip-addresses-arent-pers
onal/index.html

By Saul Hansell

Google has responded to European regulators who have suggested that Internet
Protocol addresses of users be considered personally identifiable
information.

Not surprisingly, it disagrees.

The issue matters because the standards for what companies do with data that
can be traced back to an individual are subject to tighter rules than other
information they use ‹ as they should be. Google records the I.P. address
associated with every search it handles.

In a post on the Google Public Policy Blog, Alma Whitten, a software
engineer, points out that often the I.P. address assigned to any one
computer is changed on a regular basis by the Internet provider that
services that computer.

Google, she writes, strongly supports ³the idea that data protection laws
should apply to any data that could identify you. The reality is though that
in most cases, an I.P. address without additional information cannot.²

True enough. But it¹s also true that if someone has your I.P. address, it
makes it much easier to gather the additional information needed to identify
you.

Think of an I.P. address as one of two keys needed to unlock a door. Just
because the second key is needed too, doesn¹t mean the first key shouldn¹t
also be protected.

In the case of dynamic I.P. addresses ‹ those that are periodically changed
‹ the other key is held by the Internet providers themselves. And they are
routinely forced to provide information about which customer was assigned
what I.P. address at a given time in response to legal proceedings.

Technically, fixed I.P. addresses ‹ those that are permanently assigned to a
given computer ‹ are also not personal information, because a Web site
doesn¹t know who is using that computer. But once the site, or a partner,
convinces a user at that site to reveal his or her identity ‹ to register
for a service, make a purchase, or even enter a sweepstakes ‹ that
information can be associated with everything else the users of that
computer do.

Yes, there may be more than one person who uses a computer, just as there is
often more than one person who uses a home telephone. Few people would say
that this means phone numbers aren¹t personal

Google is right to say that an I.P. address isn¹t exactly the same thing as
your Social Security number. But its blog post also skips over all the ways
that having your I.P address can help someone unlock information about what
you do online. And doing so doesn¹t help the debate over what the right
protections for personal information should be.




More information about the Infowarrior mailing list