[Infowarrior] - FCC nixes MPAA bid for selectable output control
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Wed Dec 31 14:29:10 UTC 2008
FCC chair nixes MPAA bid for selectable output control
By Matthew Lasar | Published: December 30, 2008 - 10:49PM CT
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081230-fccs-martin-nixes-mpaa-bid-on-selectable-output-control.html
The holidays have been good for Hollywood, Reuters news reports, with
sentimental pooch stories like Marley & Me boosting box office
Christmas day receipts up $10 million from last year. But there's a
lump of coal in the movie industry's stocking where its advocates had
hoped for a gift from the Federal Communications Commission. FCC Chair
Kevin Martin says he won't back the Motion Picture Association of
America's request for a waiver on the agency's ban on selectively
blocking video outputs.
"I'm not supportive of moving forward with this MPAA proposal at this
time," Martin told reporters at a press conference on Tuesday. When
Ars asked if the issue is now tabled for the Obama administration's
FCC, the outgoing boss replied in the affirmative. "If another
Commission" wants to deal with the question, "they will be able to,
obviously, but I'm not supportive of it," he said.
We need protection
As Ars has reported, in early June the MPAA filed a request for FCC
permission to work with cable and satellite video providers in order
to hobble analog output of pre-DVD release movies in favor of "secure
and protected digital outputs." Current agency policy forbids so-
called "selectable output control" use limiting either analog or
digital transmission.
MPAA argues that analog streams are insecure. They "either lack, or
can easily be stripped of, protection measures," in the organization's
words, and broadcast over them will "facilitate the illegal copying
and redistribution of this high value content, causing untold damage
to the DVD and other 'downstream' markets."
The MPAA contends that relaxing SOC rules will allow the studios to
release movies over cable and satellite prior to their DVD release
without fear of copyright infringement. "At least some segment of
nearly every demographic would find this option attractive when unable
to go to the movie theater," the trade group's Petition for Expedited
Special Relief contended. "For example, physically challenged or
elderly consumers who have limited mobility would have greater choice
in movie viewing options. It would similarly benefit parents who want
to see a new movie, but who cannot find or afford a babysitter."
MPAA filed the request on behalf of Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures,
Twentieth Century Fox, Universal City Studios, Walt Disney Studios,
and Warner Brothers.
But critics of the proposal say that consumers have the right to
expect that their video-related devices will function as they did when
they purchased them. The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) and
the advocacy group Public Knowledge—which seems to have Martin's ear
these days—have argued that millions of applications could be affected
by changing the FCC's SOC policy.
"The MPAA has not demonstrated why it should be permitted to disable
the features and functionality of a consumer's lawfully-purchased HDTV
set," three CEA Vice Presidents told the FCC in November.
Public Knowledge filed around the same time and argued that the
disability count could get higher if you include DVRs "and other
consumer electronics devices that rely on analog connections." These
also will be "effectively turned off, even if the TVs also have
digital inputs."
Astonishing!
MPAA has responded that SOC's detractors are living in the past. "At
its core, the position of CEA is that technology should be frozen in
time, and any new services that require advanced technology should be
banned," the MPAA told Democratic Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein on
November 25. "This position is quite astonishing, coming from an
organization that in the past has advocated in favor of technological
innovation."
Martin says that initially he was sympathetic to MPAA's arguments. "I
certainly am interested in taking advantage of technologies that would
allow for consumers to be able to watch first run movies in their
home, earlier," he explained. But in the end it looks like PK won the
argument.
"One of the issues that I certainly have pushed when I've been here at
the Commission is that we should be able to have devices and they
should should be able to be portable from network to network," Martin
elaborated at today's conference. He cited the open device
requirements in the recent 700MHz auction, wireless merger approvals,
and set top box rule enforcements.
"And I don't want to undermine any progress that we've tried to make
on that. I was concerned about that and wasn't ready to move forward
with it in light of some of the concerns that were raised by the
public interest groups."
The rest of today's press event focused on a variety of FCC-related
loose ends that await Martin's successor. These include re-auctioning
the agency's proposed public safety D Block, reform of the Universal
Service Fund and intercarrier compensation rules, dealing with
proposed fines against retailers for selling analog-only TVs without
full disclosure, and resolving various cable carriage disputes—most
notably the carriage fight between Comcast and the NFL Network.
The agency could conceivably deal with some of these questions in the
next few weeks, but that's not likely given the departure of
Republican Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate, which was announced at a
brief Commission meeting held Tuesday morning.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list