[Infowarrior] - Senate Report Scrutinizes the State Secrets Privilege
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Tue Aug 12 18:28:48 UTC 2008
Senate Report Scrutinizes the State Secrets Privilege
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2008/08/state_secrets.html
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/?p=1871
A new report from the Senate Judiciary Committee examines the use of
the state secrets privilege by the executive branch and describes the
intent of new legislation to strengthen judicial review of its use in
civil litigation.
The 53 page report summarizes the latest legal scholarship on the
state secrets privilege, as well as the controversy that has
surrounded it.
“In recent years, the executive branch has asserted the privilege more
frequently and broadly than before, typically to seek dismissal of
lawsuits at the pleadings stage. Facing allegations of unlawful
Government conduct ranging from domestic warrantless surveillance, to
employment discrimination, to retaliation against whistleblowers, to
torture and ‘extraordinary rendition,’ the Bush-Cheney administration
has invoked the privilege in an effort to shut down civil suits
against both Government officials and private parties. Courts have
largely acquiesced,” the report states.
“While there is some debate over the extent to which this represents a
quantitative or qualitative break from past practice, ‘[w]hat is
undebatable … is that the privilege is currently being invoked as
grounds for dismissal of entire categories of cases challenging the
constitutionality of Government action,’ and that a strong public
perception has emerged that sees the privilege as a tool for Executive
abuse.”
“In response to the growing concerns about the state secrets
privilege, Senator Kennedy, Senator Specter, and Senator Leahy
introduced the State Secrets Protection Act to provide a systematic
approach to the privilege and thereby bring stability, predictability,
and clarity to this area of the law and restore the public trust in
Government and the courts.”
The new report includes dissenting views from several Republican
members of the Judiciary Committee, who argue that the existing
arrangements already strike the “right balance between openness,
justice and national security.” See “State Secrets Protection Act,”
Senate Judiciary Committee Report 110-442, August 1.
Another new report from the Senate Judiciary Committee addresses court-
ordered secrecy, and would limit judicial authority to seal court
records pertaining to public health and safety. The report describes
pending legislation that “requires judges to consider the public’s
interest in disclosure of health and safety information before issuing
a protective order or an order to seal court records or a settlement
agreement.” See “Sunshine in Litigation Act,” Senate Judiciary
Committee Report 110-439, August 1.
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list