[Infowarrior] - China censorship damaged us, Google founders admit

[Richard Forno]

China censorship damaged us, Google founders admit
http://business.guardian.co.uk/davos2007/story/0,,1999994,00.html

Jane Martinson in Davos
Saturday January 27, 2007
The Guardian

Google's decision to censor its search engine in China was bad for the
company, its founders admitted yesterday.

Google, launched in 1998 by two Stanford University dropouts, Sergey Brin
and Larry Page, was accused of selling out and reneging on its "Don't be
evil" motto when it launched in China in 2005. The company modified the
version of its search engine in China to exclude controversial topics such
as the Tiananmen Square massacre or the Falun Gong movement, provoking a
backlash in its core western markets.

Article continues
Asked whether he regretted the decision, Mr Brin admitted yesterday: "On a
business level, that decision to censor... was a net negative."

The company has only once expressed any regret and never in as strong terms
as yesterday. Mr Brin said the company had suffered because of the damage to
its reputation in the US and Europe.

Last year in a speech in Washington Mr Brin admitted the company had been
forced to compromise its principles to operate in China. At the time, he
also hinted at a potential reversal of its stance in the country, saying
"perhaps now the principled approach makes more sense".

>From what was said yesterday a policy change seemed unlikely in the near
future. Co-founder Larry Page said: "We always consider what to do. But I
don't think we as a company should be making decisions based on too much
perception."

Much of the harm had come from newspaper headlines, he said, which affected
perception for most people, who then did not read the actual articles.

Since moving into China, Google has been compared to Microsoft because of
its dominant position and power. "We are very sensitive to people talking
about us in that way," said Mr Brin. Mr Page described the differences
between the two technology companies by saying "we have very open
partnerships, we are very clear about being fair with revenues."

Speaking about one of the hot topics of this year's meeting in Davos, Mr
Brin said he had decided to offset his carbon emissions after growing
concerned about his own use of private jets, despite not really being sure
about the efficacy of such programmes. "I was concerned about my private jet
travel and whatnot ... I wanted to offset it so I did."

Mr Brin said yesterday that he would feel a "bit better about it" by doing
something "more specific" but declined to outline what that might be. The
company's charitable arm, Google.org, takes an interest in the environment,
they said. Both men are known to have driven fuel-efficient Toyota cars.

Exactly what is inside the two men's private jet, however, has become the
stuff of dotcom legend after a legal spat between the holding company that
owns the Boeing 767 and a designer hired to re-fit it, went public last
summer. Documents published in US newspapers included plans for a lounge for
Eric Schmidt, the chief executive, and two state rooms for the co-founders.
There were also calls from the founders for hammocks to be hung from the
ceiling of the plane.

Both founders yesterday offered some solace to the newspaper industry, which
has been most threatened by the growth of online news providers. Larry Page
said: "I believe in the future of newspapers," before admitting that he
reads all his news online. His colleague said he read a Sunday newspaper
"and it's nice".

Rather than suggest paid-for content was doomed, they called for a new model
to collect revenues. "I should probably pay for the Wall Street Journal but
I don't because it's a hassle," said Mr Page, who is worth billions. "I'm
not worried about the money thing, it's just a hassle."