[Infowarrior] - The fact and fiction of camcorder piracy
Richard Forno
rforno at infowarrior.org
Thu Feb 15 16:46:50 EST 2007
The fact and fiction of camcorder piracy
Internet law professor Michael Geist examines the arguments surrounding
camcorder piracy of movies and says facts should be separated from fiction.
In recent months, a steady stream of reports have asserted that movie piracy
is on the rise in countries around the world resulting in hundreds of
millions of pounds in lost revenue.
Pointing to the prevalence of illegal camcording - a practice that involves
videotaping a movie directly off the screen in a theatre and transferring
the copy onto DVDs for commercial sale - the major Hollywood studios have
launched incentive programs for theatre employees to report camcording
incidents and threatened to delay the distribution of their top movies.
While the reports have succeeded in attracting considerable attention, a
closer examination of the industry's own data reveals that the claims are
based primarily on fiction rather than fact.
In the best Hollywood tradition, the Motion Picture Association of America
(MPAA) and its foreign counterparts have put on a show that is much ado
about nothing, featuring unsubstantiated and inconsistent claims about
camcording, exaggerations about its economic harm, and misleading critiques
of the law.
Different figures
First, the camcorder claims have themselves involved wildly different
figures.
For example, over the past two weeks, reports have pegged the Canadian
percentage of global camcording at either 40 or 50%.
Yet the International Intellectual Property Alliance, a U.S. lobby group
that includes the MPAA, advised the US government in late September that
Canadians were the source for 23% of camcorded copies of DVDs.
Camcorded DVDs, which typically feature awful sound and picture quality,
ultimately compete with theatrical releases for only a few weeks
Not surprisingly, none of these figures have been subject to independent
audit or review. In fact, AT&T Labs, which conducted the last major public
study on movie piracy in 2003, concluded that 77 percent of pirated movies
actually originate from industry insiders and advance screener copies
provided to movie reviewers.
Moreover, the industry's numbers indicate that camcorded versions of DVDs
strike only a fraction of the movies that are released each year. While the
UK Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT) last year claimed that UK
cinemas have been the source for pirate DVDs of blockbuster films such as
X-Men: The Last Stand,and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, the MPAA's
data suggests that these incidents are relatively rare.
Infringing DVDs
As of August 2006, the MPAA documented 179 camcorded movies as the source
for infringing DVDs since 2004. During that time, its members released
approximately 1,400 movies, suggesting that approximately one in every 10
movies is camcorded and sold as infringing DVDs.
Second, the claims of economic harm associated with camcorded movies have
been grossly exaggerated. The industry has suggested that of recently
released movies on DVD, 90% can be sourced to camcording. This data is
misleading not only because a small fraction of recently released movies are
actually available on DVD, but also because the window of availability of
the camcorded versions is very short.
Counterfeiters invariably seek to improve the quality of their DVDs by
dropping the camcorder versions as soon as the studios begin production of
authentic DVDs (which provide the source for perfect copies).
Camcorded DVDs, which typically feature awful sound and picture quality,
ultimately compete with theatrical releases for only a few weeks and likely
have very limited impact as they do not represent a viable substitute for
the overwhelming majority of moviegoers.
Lion's share
In fact, as the movie industry has grown - global revenues have nearly
tripled over the past 25 years - the importance of theatre revenues has
shrunk. In 1980, theatre box office revenues represented 55% of movie
revenue.
Today, DVDs and television licensing capture the lion's share of revenue,
with the box office only responsible for approximately 15% of movie revenue.
In other words, the economic impact of camcorded DVDs - which involve only
one in 10 releases and impact a small part of the revenue cycle - is little
more than a rounding error in a US$45 billion industry.
Third, claims that copyright law is ill-equipped to deal with camcorder
piracy are similarly misleading.
The law in many jurisdictions - including the UK, Canada, and Australia -
currently renders it illegal to make for sale or rental an infringing copy
of a copyrighted work such as movie.
It is not uncommon to find severe penalties for violating this provision
with the potential for million dollar fines and prison sentences.
Indeed, the MPAA's own website acknowledges that many countries have
legislation that prohibit illegal camcording.
While the MPAA is anxious for other countries to adopt tough U.S.
anti-camcording laws, there is no evidence that those provisions - which
open the door to lengthy jail sentences for releasing movies before they
launch in theatres - have had a significant deterrent effect.
In fact, the president of the U.S. National Association of Theatre Owners
told his members in November that illegal camcording in the US has expanded
over the past two years from New York and Los Angeles to at least 15 states
across the country.
Despite all the evidence the contrary, the MPAA continues to lobby for
unnecessary legal reforms.
Unless politicians separate fact from fiction, this show appears headed for
a frightening finale.
Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law
at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/6334913.stm
Published: 2007/02/06 13:04:39 GMT
© BBC MMVII
More information about the Infowarrior
mailing list