[Infowarrior] - More Congressional Copyright Shenanigans

[Richard Forno]

Rather than attack 'infringing' computers, as Berman proposed a few years
ago, they'll just seize 'em outright.  Niiiiiice.    Idiots, all.   ---rf


Congress' copyright reform: seize computers, boost penalties, spend money

By Nate Anderson | Published: December 06, 2007 - 01:16PM CT

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071206-congress-copyright-reform-seiz
e-computers-boost-penalties-spend-money.html

A bipartisan group of Congressmen (and one woman) yesterday introduced a
major bill aimed at boosting US intellectual property laws and the penalties
that go along with them. While much of the legislation targets industrial
counterfeiting and knockoff drugs, it also allows the government to seize
people's computers.

The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO
IP... groan) Act of 2007 has the backing of many of the most powerful
politicians on the House Judiciary Committee, including John Conyers (D-MI),
Lamar Smith (R-TX), and "Hollywood" Howard Berman (D-CA).

In addition to strengthening both civil and criminal penalties for copyright
and trademark infringement, the big development here is the proposed
creation of the Office of the United States Intellectual Property
Enforcement Representative (USIPER). This is a new executive branch office
tasked with coordinating IP enforcement at the national and international
level. To do this work internationally, the bill also authorizes US
intellectual property officers to be sent to other countries in order to
assist with crackdowns there. In addition, the Department of Justice gets
additional funding and a new unit to help prosecute IP crimes.

The bill, which will have a committee hearing soon, is supposed to
kick-start the copyright reform process talked about for so long. But
copyright reform means one thing to the PRO IP sponsors and another to the
consumer groups that have been advocating for it.

Gigi Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, said in a statement, "seizing
expensive manufacturing equipment used for large-scale infringement from a
commercial pirate may be appropriate. Seizing a family's general-purpose
computer in a download case, as this bill would allow, is not appropriate."

In addition, she protests the increase in "already extraordinary copyright
damages" and calls for damages to be linked more closely to actual harm
suffered by copyright holders.

The Digital Freedom Campaign, backed by the EFF, Public Knowledge, and the
Consumer Electronics Association, was more muted in its criticism, instead
choosing to praise the legislation for launching a "conversation" about
copyright reform. The Digital Freedom Campaign's Maura Corbett said that
meaningful copyright reform "must include limits on statutory damages and
the codification of the vital principles of fair use," and she hopes that
PRO IP "will serve as a catalyst to larger, more meaningful reform."

Fortunately, at least some members of the Judiciary Committee are at least
aware that the consumer groups have legitimate points to make. Berman, who
chairs the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property,
announced that his subcommittee would hold a hearing next week on the issue.

"As a cosponsor, I obviously feel very strongly that we must strengthen
enforcement efforts to fight piracy and counterfeiting," Berman said. "At
the hearing, we will be hearing testimony from both industry experts and
from labor and consumer advocates to make sure that in doing so, we don't
deny appropriate access to America's intellectual property."

Who is thrilled with the bill? The MPAA, for one. MPAA head Dan Glickman, in
a statement praising the new bill, said that "films left costs foreign and
domestic distributors, retailers and others $18 billion a year," a
significant increase from the $6 billion it allegedly costs the studios.