[Infowarrior] - Study: Students more wary of Wikipedia, online resources than thought

[Richard Forno]

Study: Students more wary of Wikipedia, online resources than thought

By Nate Anderson | Published: August 24, 2007 - 01:32AM CT

(article link)
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070824-study-students-more-wary-of-wi
kipedia-online-resources-than-thought.html

(study link)
http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/head/index.html


A new study conducted at a California liberal arts college found that
students don't look first at Wikipedia when given a research assignment.
They don't even go to Google or Yahoo. Instead, most students look at their
course readings, talk to professors, and use their library's web site and
databases. Hurrah for US research skills? Not exactly.

The study appears in the current issue of First Monday, a peer-reviewed
online-only journal dealing with digital culture. Researchers at St. Mary's,
a small liberal arts college in California, took a look at what students did
when confronted with a new research assignment from a professor. The
findings aren't especially surprising: the first thing students did was to
get confused and procrastinate. Once they finally settled down to work,
though, the surprises began.

Some professors have lamented the fact that too many students dive right
into Wikipedia or fire up general search engines when searching for
scholarly information. The St. Mary's study found, though, that 40 percent
of students surveyed first went to their course materials for background
information and citations.

Next up was the library web site, where 23 percent of students went first.
Search engines were the first destination for 13 percent of students, and 12
percent went to the professor. Only 3 percent tried Wikipedia. Students were
also (thankfully) aware that blogs weren't scholarly sources, and all of
them noted that they would not include blog data in a research paper.

Those findings would be more heartening if they were representative of all
college students; sadly, that's not the case. The study included only
upper-division students, which excludes half of the US collegiate
population. It took place at a small liberal arts school with an annual
tuition of $30,000 a year (not including room and board). And it relied on
the survey data of 178 students (survey data can lend itself to the
underreporting of "undesirable" behaviors) rather than on observation. As
such, we wonder how the data would look were the scope considerably
expanded. 

Perhaps the survey wasn't representative of all students, but it was
interesting in that it covered a fairly privileged subset of students‹and
even these students admitted to being routinely confused about doing
research, procrastinating until the last possible moment, and finding the
research process "barely a tolerable task." The study found that even these
upper-level students were "confused by what college-level research entails."

Concerns about students running to the web to take shortcuts on their
research may be overblown, but it is clear that students need better
instruction and tools to guide their research. In light of this, it's
surprising how many students aren't turning to online resources, even if
these resources may be flawed.