[Infowarrior] - 2006 Stupid Security Competition

[Richard Forno]

PI announces the 2006 Stupid Security Competition

21/08/2006

STUPID SECURITY AWARDS

http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-541996

We've all been there. Standing for ages in a security line at an
inconsequential office building only to be given a security pass that a high
school student could have faked. Or being forced to produce photo ID for
even the most innocent activity.

If you thought after Enron that the accountancy profession was bad news,
just wait till you hear how terrible the security industry has become. Even
before the recent "liquid bomb" scare a whole army of bumbling amateurs has
taken it upon themselves to figure out pointless, annoying, intrusive,
illusory and just plain stupid measures to "protect" our security.

Stupid security has become a global menace. From the airport that this month
emptied out a full plane because a passenger was drinking from a lemonade
bottle, to the British schools that fingerprint their children to ³stop² the
theft of library books, to the airline company that refused to allow
passengers to bring books or magazines onto the plane, the world has become
infested with bumptious administrators competing to hinder or harass us -
and often for no good reason whatever.

The sensitive and sensible folk at Privacy International have endured enough
of this treatment. So we are running an international competition to
discover the world's most pointless, intrusive, stupid and self-serving
security measures.

The "Stupid Security Awards" aim to highlight the absurdities of the
security industry. Privacy International¹s director, Simon Davies, said his
group had taken the initiative because of ³innumerable² security initiatives
around the world that had absolutely no genuine security benefit. The awards
were first staged in 2003 and attracted over 5,000 nominations. This will be
the second competition in the series.

"The situation has become ridiculous" said Mr Davies. "Security has become
the smokescreen for incompetent and robotic managers the world over".

Unworkable security practices and illusory security measures do nothing to
help issues of real public concern. They only hinder the public, intrude
unnecessary into our private lives and often reduce us to the status of
cattle.

The airline industry is the most prominent offender, but it is not alone.
Consider the UK rail company that banned train-spotters on the grounds of
security (e.g. see this article(external). Or the security desk of a US
office building that complained because paramedics rushing to attend a
heart-attack victim had failed to sign-in. Or the metro company that
installed a $20,000 biological weapons/gas detector and placed it openly
next to a power plug so terrorists could conveniently unplug the device.

Privacy International is calling for nominations to name and shame the worst
offenders. The competition closes on October 31st 2006. The award categories
are:

    * Most Egregiously Stupid Award
    * Most Inexplicably Stupid Award
    * Most Annoyingly Stupid Award
    * Most Flagrantly Intrusive Award
    * Most Stupidly Counter Productive Award

The competition will be judged by an international panel of well-known
security experts, public policy specialists, privacy advocates and
journalists.

The competition is open to anyone from any country. Nominations can be sent
to stupidsecurity at privacy.org.

Details of previous award winners can be found below, or at
http://www.privacyinternational.org/ssa2003winners.