From griffin76 at eml.cc Tue Oct 5 06:38:07 2004 From: griffin76 at eml.cc (Nenad) Date: Tue Oct 5 06:44:51 2004 Subject: [hardcore] Renderware Studio Message-ID: <1096972687.30891.205790294@webmail.messagingengine.com> Ako neko zeli da pravi demoe, a fali im engine/alatke za pravljenje demoa, preporucujem Renderware studio (koji sluzi za pravljenje igara). Mislim da svako ko je u stanju da programira u Flash-u, moze da radi sa ovime, a plus je jos sistem multiplatformski, tako da mozete napraviti demo za pc i sve moguce konzole. Eto, cisto vise da nekukate kako vam fale koderi, pa ne mozete da pravite demoe. Uh da jedna sitnica, potrebno je znati c++, da bi se programiralo u ovome, ali je engine vrlo kompletan, tj ima i grafiku i fiziku i fin lepi studio u kome mozete slagati svoj demo, a i radi preko mreze, tj mozete pustiti svoj demo na jednom kompjuteru, a kontrolisati ga sa drugog iz studia, pa ako neko zeli da postane vj, eto mu prilike. Pozdrav, griffin. P.S. Rockstar games radi igre u ovome naprimer. -- Nenad griffin76@eml.cc From paran0id at luukku.com Sat Oct 9 08:58:19 2004 From: paran0id at luukku.com (Paran0iD) Date: Sat Oct 9 09:02:07 2004 Subject: [hardcore] moog Message-ID: <000f01c4adff$a6d7c200$5340c551@soren0id> from http://www.zu33.com/moog/ -- MOOG hits theaters September 24 (in USA) Bob Moog (b. 1934) has been inventing and building electronic musical instruments for nearly half a century. Still active in his workshop in rural North Carolina, Moog continues to shape musical culture with some of the most inspiring instruments ever created. This feature documentary film - by filmmaker/musician Hans Fjellestad and the producer team behind Frontier Life (2003) - explores Moog's collaborations with musicians over the years, and his ideas about creativity, design, interactivity and spirituality. The film was shot on location in Asheville, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Tokyo and London, featuring appearances by Keith Emerson, Walter Sear, Gershon Kinsgley, Jean-Jacques Perrey & Luke Vibert, Rick Wakeman, DJ Spooky, Herb Deutsch, Bernie Worrell, Pamelia Kurstin, Tino Corp. with Charlie Clouser, Money Mark, Mix Master Mike, and an eclectic mix of performers. Artists such as Stereolab, Meat Beat Manifesto, Tortoise, Money Mark, Luke Vibert & Jean-Jacques Perrey, 33, Moog Cookbook, Plastiq Phantom, Psilonaut, Bernie Worrell & Bootsy Collins, Roger O'Donnell, The Album Leaf, Pete Devriese, Bostich, Charlie Clouser, Baiyon, Suzanne Ciani, Gershon Kingsley, Doug McKechnie, Electric Skychurch and others are contributing original music produced on Moog instruments for the soundtrack. From fraud at EUnet.yu Thu Oct 28 04:20:38 2004 From: fraud at EUnet.yu (Boris Petrovic) Date: Thu Oct 28 04:15:32 2004 Subject: [hardcore] evil flash Message-ID: <000c01c4bcc7$2dc02f20$bc01f0d5@t9e2n0> je li mogutje unutar jedne strane postaviti dva flash file-a, gde tje jedan biti navigacioni meni a drugi recimo file sa animacijama, i onda sa jednog file-a kontrolisati drugi ? kao shto na primer kada sa normalnog linka imamo opciju control flash or shocwave, i onda unutar toga play | stop | rewind | go to frame. takodje, zanimalo bi me kako da unutar jednog flash file-a, koji bi se sastojao od nav menija i animacije, odradim shirenje po horizontali strane ( kada se uchitava u razlichitim rezolucijama) kao shto u htmlu odradjujemo tabelu u procentima, pa se ona uvek shiri do granica strane. znam da postoji opcija da se flash shiri unutar cele strane, horizontalno i vertikalno ( ali ne znam gde da je nadjem) no to bi nagrdilo jpeg slike unutar njega. dakle, ista pricha kao sa procentualnim tabelama, samo unutar flasha. btw prilichno mi je hitno da ovo saznam, pa, budite azhurni :). 10x in advance. FraudatoR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/hardcore/attachments/20041028/02173ad7/attachment-0001.html From griffin76 at eml.cc Thu Oct 28 04:35:53 2004 From: griffin76 at eml.cc (Nenad) Date: Thu Oct 28 04:44:09 2004 Subject: [hardcore] evil flash In-Reply-To: <000c01c4bcc7$2dc02f20$bc01f0d5@t9e2n0> References: <000c01c4bcc7$2dc02f20$bc01f0d5@t9e2n0> Message-ID: <1098952553.31877.207441209@webmail.messagingengine.com> http://www.flashmove.com/board/today.php?s=b67a0e950743a3b7601e4ff8fe2c3619 On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:20:38 +0200, "Boris Petrovic" said: > _______________________________________________ > hardcore mailing list > hardcore@attrition.org > http://www.attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/hardcore -- Nenad griffin76@eml.cc From domin8r at galeb.etf.bg.ac.yu Sun Oct 31 14:02:03 2004 From: domin8r at galeb.etf.bg.ac.yu (domin8r///corrosion) Date: Mon Nov 1 18:35:58 2004 Subject: [hardcore] Fwd: NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20041031200132.01e09dc0@galeb.etf.bg.ac.yu> ['bezicne bubice za polaganje ispita' -d] >X-From_: nettime-l-request@bbs.thing.net Sat Oct 30 16:06:33 2004 >Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:17:02 -0400 (EDT) >From: David Mandl >To: Nettime >Subject: NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate >Sender: nettime-l-request@bbs.thing.net >Reply-To: David Mandl > >http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/29/bulge/index.html > >[Nelson's photos at the URL above] > >NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate >Physicist says imaging techniques prove the president's bulge was not >caused by wrinkled clothing. >by Kevin Berger > >Oct. 29, 2004 | George W. Bush tried to laugh off the bulge. "I don't >know what that is," he said on "Good Morning America" on Wednesday, >referring to the infamous protrusion beneath his jacket during the >presidential debates. "I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored >shirt." > >Dr. Robert M. Nelson, however, was not laughing. He knew the president was >not telling the truth. And Nelson is neither conspiracy theorist nor >midnight blogger. He's a senior research scientist for NASA and for >Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and an international authority on >image analysis. Currently he's engrossed in analyzing digital photos of >Saturn's moon Titan, determining its shape, whether it contains craters or >canyons. > >For the past week, while at home, using his own computers, and off the >clock at Caltech and NASA, Nelson has been analyzing images of the >president's back during the debates. A professional physicist and photo >analyst for more than 30 years, he speaks earnestly and thoughtfully about >his subject. "I am willing to stake my scientific reputation to the >statement that Bush was wearing something under his jacket during the >debate," he says. "This is not about a bad suit. And there's no way the >bulge can be described as a wrinkled shirt." > >Nelson and a scientific colleague produced the photos from a videotape, >recorded by the colleague, who has chosen to remain anonymous, of the >first debate. The images provide the most vivid details yet of the bulge >beneath the president's suit. Amateurs have certainly had their turn at >examining the bulge, but no professional with a r=E9sum=E9 as impressive >as Nelson's has ventured into public with an informed opinion. In fact, no >one to date has enhanced photos of Bush's jacket to this degree of >precision, and revealed what appears to be some kind of mechanical device >with a wire snaking up the president's shoulder toward his neck and down >his back to his waist. > >Nelson stresses that he's not certain what lies beneath the president's >jacket. He offers, though, "that it could be some type of electronic >device -- it's consistent with the appearance of an electronic device worn >in that manner." The image of lines coursing up and down the president's >back, Nelson adds, is "consistent with a wire or a tube." > >Nelson used the computer software program Photoshop to enhance the texture >in Bush's jacket. The process in no way alters the image but sharpens its >edges and accents the creases and wrinkles. You've seen the process >performed a hundred times on "CSI": pixelated images are magnified to >reveal a clear definition of their shape. > >Bruce Hapke, professor emeritus of planetary science in the department of >geology and planetary science at the University of Pittsburgh, reviewed >the Bush images employed by Nelson, whom he calls "a very highly respected >scientist in his field." Hapke says Nelson's process of analyzing the >images are the "exact same methods we use to analyze images taken by >spacecraft of planetary surfaces. It does not introduce any artifacts into >the picture in any way." > >How can Nelson be certain there's some kind of mechanical device beneath >Bush's jacket? It's all about light and shadows, he says. The angles at >which the light in the studio hit Bush's jacket expose contours that fit >no one's picture of human anatomy and wrinkled shirts. And Nelson compared >the images to anatomy texts. He also experimented with wrinkling shirts in >various configurations, wore them under his jacket under his bathroom >light, and couldn't produce anything close to the Bush bulge. > >In the enhanced photo of the first debate, Nelson says, look at the >horizontal white line in middle of the president's back. You'll see a >shadow. "That's telling me there's definitely a bulge," he says. "In fact, >it's how we measure the depths of the craters on the moon or on Mars. We >look at the angle of the light and the length of shadow they leave. In >this case, that's clearly a crater that's under the horizontal line -- >it's clearly a rim of a bulge protruding upward, one due to forces pushing >it up from beneath." > >Hapke, too, agrees that the bulge is neither anatomy nor a wrinkled shirt. >"I would think it's very hard to avoid the conclusion that there's >something underneath his jacket," he says. "It would certainly be >consistent with some kind of radio receiver and a wire." > >Nelson admits that he's a Democrat and plans to vote for John Kerry. But >he takes umbrage at being accused of partisanship. "Everyone wants to >think my colleague and I are just a bunch of dope-crazed ravaged Democrats >who are looking to insult the president at the last minute," he says. "And >that's not what this is about. This is scientific analysis. If the bulge >were on Bill Clinton's back and he was lying about it, I'd have to say the >same thing." > >"Look, he says, "I'm putting myself at risk for exposing this. But this is >too important. It's not about my reputation. If they force me into an >early retirement, it'll be worth it if the public knows about this. It's >outrageous statements that I read that the president is wearing nothing >under there. There's clearly something there." > > > > > ># distributed via : no commercial use without permission ># is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, ># collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets ># more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body ># archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net