[Dataloss] Best Western Response
DAIL, WILLARD A
ADAIL at sunocoinc.com
Tue Aug 26 20:20:31 UTC 2008
-----Original Message-----
From: DAIL, WILLARD A
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:02 PM
To: dataloss at attrition.org
Subject: RE: [Dataloss] Best Western Response
Good point. The hospitality industry is one where franchisees
or local owners participate in branding, so any given location may or
may not be company owned.
-----Original Message-----
From: dataloss-bounces at attrition.org
[mailto:dataloss-bounces at attrition.org] On Behalf Of JAMES RITCHIE
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:41 PM
To: Harris, Michael C.; dataloss at attrition.org
Cc: macwheel99 at wowway.com
Subject: Re: [Dataloss] Best Western Response
Loophole that is found.
If each local hotel gains their own merchant ID,
processes the transaction through a payment gateway that is not the
corporate headquarters, then their level will be determined on that
merchant ID, not the aggregate of all the hotels.
If each hotel processes through corporate headquarters
(now becomes the gateway) to the payment gateway, then the aggregate of
all hotels would be combined into one.
I have seen where each location was forced to get their
own merchant ID and payment gateway to keep the transactions down, thus
keeping the cost of audits down.
James Ritchie
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/b89/433
This message and any files transmitted with it is intended solely for the designated recipient and may contain privileged, proprietary or otherwise private information. Unauthorized use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://attrition.org/pipermail/dataloss/attachments/20080826/438ccdfd/attachment.html
More information about the Dataloss
mailing list