[Dataloss] Nevada Law Mandates Encryption of Electronically-Transmitted Personal Information

[B.K. DeLong]

Speaking of PII and other such data, did anyone ever attempt to bring
the "PCI DSS as law" into the mix in NV? If encryption was proposed,
I'd be surprised if other such protections were not as well.

At last count, MN, CA, TX, MA and IL have or had laws proposed
containing bits of the PCI DSS. Did I miss anyone?

On 10/25/07, Chris Walsh <cwalsh at cwalsh.org> wrote:
> I emailed the author of the article at mofo.com (man do I want
> an email address there...).
>
> She replied that have they don't have any evidence that Nevada has
> changed this definition or whether it relies on it or a
> different one.
>
> Maybe this will come out when/if a case is brought to court...
>
> Chris
>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:04:01AM -0500, Chris Walsh wrote:
> > Does this mean that Nevada has changed the definition of
> > "encryption" that they use in their laws?
> _______________________________________________
> Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss at attrition.org)
> http://attrition.org/dataloss
>
> Tenable Network Security offers data leakage and compliance monitoring
> solutions for large and small networks. Scan your network and monitor your
> traffic to find the data needing protection before it leaks out!
> http://www.tenablesecurity.com/products/compliance.shtml
>


-- 
B.K. DeLong (K3GRN)
bkdelong at pobox.com
+1.617.797.8471

http://www.wkdelong.org                    Son.
http://www.ianetsec.com                    Work.
http://www.bostonredcross.org             Volunteer.
http://www.carolingia.eastkingdom.org   Service.
http://bkdelong.livejournal.com             Play.


PGP Fingerprint:
38D4 D4D4 5819 8667 DFD5  A62D AF61 15FF 297D 67FE

FOAF:
http://foaf.brain-stream.org