[Dataloss] Employee vs client data?

[B.K. DeLong]

Right - I would guess, (with credit and your permission), that Attrition &
PogoWasRight.org would switch to your data set or at least import the data
you've collected into their database.

On 10/16/06, Allan Friedman <allan_friedman at ksgphd.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> > It would be cool if we could begin distinguishing whether it was
> employee
> > data that was lost or client data, (or both).
>
> There's a field for data subject my data. I also note the presence of
> a principle-agent relationship for data protection, for when a third
> party is safeguarding the data on behalf of the {employer/merchant}.
> Finally, the data subject could have no direct or transitive
> relationship with the data subject (i.e. Choicepoint).  I only have it
> for publicly traded companies, though.
>
> I hate to keep this stuff as a shadow dataset, but since exact date
> and sequence of info is critical to our project, it's taken longer
> than expected to make sure it's good.  We really look forward to
> sharing it soon.
>
> allan
> _______________________________________________
> Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss at attrition.org)
> http://attrition.org/dataloss
> Tracking more than 137 million compromised records in 430 incidents over 6
> years.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://attrition.org/pipermail/dataloss/attachments/20061016/4870ae24/attachment.html