[attrition] Fuck
security curmudgeon
jericho at attrition.org
Thu May 11 06:15:07 EDT 2006
http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1087/
Fuck
Christopher M. Fairman, Ohio State Moritz College of Law
(PDF format) - March 7, 2006
ABSTRACT:
This Article is as simple and provocative as its title suggests: it
explores the legal implications of the word fuck. The intersection of the
word fuck and the law is examined in four major areas: First Amendment,
broadcast regulation, sexual harassment, and education. The legal
implications from the use of fuck vary greatly with the context. To fully
understand the legal power of fuck, the nonlegal sources of its power are
tapped. Drawing upon the research of etymologists, linguists,
lexicographers, psychoanalysts, and other social scientists, the visceral
reaction to fuck can be explained by cultural taboo. Fuck is a taboo word.
The taboo is so strong that it compels many to engage in self-censorship.
This process of silence then enables small segments of the population to
manipulate our rights under the guise of reflecting a greater community.
Taboo is then institutionalized through law, yet at the same time is in
tension with other identifiable legal rights. Understanding this
relationship between law and taboo ultimately yields fuck jurisprudence.
SUBJECT AREA:
Communications Law; Constitutional Law; Education Law; Employment
Practice; Psychology and Psychiatry; Sexuality and the Law
SUGGESTED CITATION:
Christopher M. Fairman, "Fuck" (March 7, 2006). ExpressO Preprint Series.
Working Paper 1087.
http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1087
More information about the attrition
mailing list