http://www.antionline.com/cgi-bin/News?type=antionline&date=05-10-1999&story=white.news Interview: WhiteHouse Hacker Monday, May 10, 1999 at 18:09:16 by Kelvin Wong - AntiOnline Staff Member [snip...] Having gained access to www1.whitehouse.gov first, he ran a sniffer and gained further access to www2.whitehouse.gov. [ATTRITION staff caught up with the hacker and asked about the details of the hack. One of them replied: (anon) the only inaccurate thing was www2 wasn't penetrated] Read the (now) printed and supposedly unedited chat between Wong and the attacker: http://www.antionline.com/news/antionline/white-house-interview/ Also real nice of them to drop two of the nicknames of the attackers after promising anonymity. When Mr. Wong was asked about the printing of the interview and who was responsible, he replied: (mercs) let's just say i wasn't consulted when it was printed. Editors Note: AntiOnline staff member Kelvin Wong viewed the website in its hacked state, while talking to "John Smith". AntiOnline was furnished logs and other materials to verify this individual's claims. Officials at the white house refused to comment. [Around 2:15pm on Monday May 10, 'mercs' finished his interview with 'John Smith'. The page was put up around 6am the same day. The claims that he viewed the page in its hacked state are also refuted by the hackers: (anon) mercs saw it before it went live.. (anon) he was told about the http://www1.whitehouse.gov/index.html preview of what was comming @ 6am When Mr. Wong was asked about errors in his article, he replied: [*] [Whois] [mercs] [*] address : mercs@blackcrows.jupitertech.com [*] ircname : Kelvin Wong (mercs) i did this real quick!! didn't had time to like re-read and change. furthermore, i can't change it anymore@!#!@..so stop complainning!@)#!@)(#!@ (mercs) $%)($!)(@#)@!(#@!)( (mercs) anyway, i'm off people (mercs) got to go to school =( (mercs) ALRIGHT. (mercs) since everyone is bitching at me (mercs) i'm going to go to school (mercs) when i'm, back..i'll fix it up (mercs) MOTHER FUCKERS!@)#(@!#)(!@ How.. professional. In a non-exclusive interview with the attackers (partially quoted above), one went on to say this when asked about the antionline article: (anon2) i don't like antionline or their ethics