We thought it would be a fad. Ok, we hoped it would be a fad, destined
to go away as quickly as it came. Unfortunately, those worthless e-mail legal
disclaimers still pollute the internet. Written by overzealous lawyers that
don't seem to realize the
stupidity futility of their effort, poorly worded
legal gibberish tries to force you into binding contracts to protect their careless
mistakes. One of their employees just fires off an e-mail full of corporate
secrets? No worries! That legal disclaimer will ensure the unintended recipient
deletes it without question! Wishful thinking douchebag lawyers.
We can't help it--this really makes us nuts. When will these people learn? You transmitted your crappy mind-numbing message to us, in plain text, over the public internet. It's ours (and whoever is sniffing our mail) to do with as we please and you can't have it back, so piss off. We won't delete it, we will publish it, we will forward it, and there is nothing you can do about it. Go ahead, take us to court, but try to find a shred of legal precedent first, ok?
Many other folks have chimed in on this epidemic of user stupidity previously. How many articles must be written, how many snarky replies sent, before these litigious prone companies pull their collective heads out of their asses?
To be fair, some people work at Really Big Companies® where one of these boiler-plate atrocities dutifully gets stamped on the end of all outgoing messages by the mail server, regardless of the user's common-sense quotient. These people cannot be held liable for their employer's misguided sense of self preservation. Then there are those middle-management, PHB, bottom-feeding, thumb-sucking imbeciles who insist on following the rest of the herd and slap together their signature with a poignant indicator of their blatant ignorance of the law. If all you have is a hammer...
How did we get here, and what are we doing wrong that we feel the need to include these ridiculous appendages in the first place? Did someone accidentally (oops) send private client data to the wrong recipient (idiot)? Did someone mistakenly enter the wrong alias in the To: field (asshat)? Or did they forward a confidential document to their competitor (moron)? Or maybe they asked Attrition staff really stupid questions? (brilliant!) Gotta love those squirrels at least.
If you transmit any content to the wrong recipient, contact them, confess your sin, and gently ask for their mercy. If they use it against you, that's malicious behavior on their part and they might be on the fast track to hell. I certainly know how we'd handle it here. There's plenty of room next to Hoffa in the Giants' end zone for another corpse. Why plead for mercy? Simple, because there is absolutely no legal precedent for these legal disclaimers having any weight in any court of law.
What are some best practices that the average corporate peon can do instead of attaching silly disclaimers to every mail? Don't hit send until you've proofread the mail, including the headers. Typos happen. Responsible grown-ups should catch them. Sensitive information? Encryption is your friend. Really sensitive information? FedEx is your friend. Voilà! What are the consequences of any content or attachments you accidentally send being made public? Is it worth ten bucks to use an overnight carrier instead of ending up as the latest entry on Dataloss? What's your reputation worth? Remember, email's like a postcard, open to the world. We love other people's postcards.
Failing that, if your dimwit corporate lawyers insist on keeping the disclaimer, either take a baseball bat to their kneecap or demand that the disclaimer go at the top of the mail. While crappy mega-giant software makers can get away with 'shrink wrap licenses', as Paul Goodman says, "Despite their widespread use, there still remain serious legal questions regarding the validity of the shrink-wrap license." Like the shrink wrap licenses, e-mail disclaimers at the end of the e-mail force a user to open the mail/software before 'agreeing' to the terms. No, they don't really agree, but that is the implication and desire of such licenses.
Tired of seeing these silly disclaimers on every third public mail-list post? What to do.. what to do! Easy, follow their instructions. Almost every disclaimer has a provision that suggests that if the mail is not addressed to you, you should send it back to the person that sent it in the first place, or send it to the legal counsel of their firm. Ok! Every.. single.. mail, do just that. If they send it to email@example.com, it was not addressed to you, and by their own twisted reasoning it should be sent back to them so they can figure out what bad things are happening as a result. One post to a list of 5,000 responsible professionals that honor these goofball disclaimers and guess what..
- Stupid Email Disclaimers - Jeff Goldberg
"The value of disclaimers is limited, since the courts normally attach more weight to the substantive content of the communication and the circumstances in which it is made than to any disclaimer...Even though their effectiveness in court is doubtful..." -- From the UK's weblaw via Jeff Goldberg
- Jeff Goldmark's list of Parody Disclaimers
- Disclaimers could make emails into contracts
- Readers' Letters - The Email Disclaimer Awards 2001
- The Email Disclaimer
"But there’s a fine line between legally wise and intellectually ridiculous."
- E-mail disclaimers explained
The sobering reality is, however, that the validity of these disclaimers have not yet been tested by our courts and most businesses draft and implement their disclaimers in such a way that they are invalid, unenforceable and useless."
- Trailers: Disclaimers
- EMail Disclaimers - Frequently Asked Questions
- EMail Disclaimers - Should you use them?
- E-mail Confidential - Who's afraid of Time Inc.'s legal disclaimer?
This electronic emission ("web page") message, including
any and/or all links/images, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s),
and may contain confidential and/or underprivileged information, pertaining
to business conducted under the direction and supervision of Jared E. Richo
and/or his harem, as well as is the property of Jared E. Richo and/or his posse,
or otherwise protected from disclosure. All electronic web pages, which may
have been established as expressed views and/or opinions (stated either within
the electronic web page or any of its link/images), are left at the sole discretion
and responsibility of that of the sender, and are not necessarily attributed
to Jared E. Richo. Unauthorized interception, review, use, sexual gratification,
taunting, disclosure or distribution of any such information contained within
this electronic web page and/or its image(s), is(are)(were) strictly prohibited.
As this web page may be legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended
only for the use of the web browser, no web surfer should forward, print, copy,
destroy, mangle or otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would
allow it to be viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
warned and notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, dissection,
distribution, dilution, damnation, deallocation, decentralization, decimation,
decomposition, decoration, decryption, dedication, deduction, deforestation,
deformation, degeneration, degradation, deletion, delineation, demolition, copying
or the taking of any action in reliance upon the information herein is very
very very strictly prohibited (seriously, ok?). If you have received this web
page in error, please notify the "back button" immediately, delete all browser
cache, delete all browser cookies, uninstall your web browser, and format your
hard drive, followed by the masturbation of the viewer of this or any related
message that may or may not have stimulated the viewer.
Copyright 2006 by Martums & Jericho. Permission is granted to quote, reprint or redistribute provided the text is not altered, and appropriate credit is given.