From: /dev/null (email@example.com)
To: John xxxx
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 23:53:26 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: MASS HACK by RSH, domains listed in message
On 3 Sep 2000, John xxxx wrote:
: sorry about that. i didn't know you would actually check all of them,
: you could have just said "list of defaced domains is in html" or some
: shit like that, oh well.
You didn't know we would actually check all of them, so you thought it'd
be okay to -claim- a list of domains of which only a fourth were actually
hit? You really think that's cool? Putting a list of 'defaced' domains
on your defacement, when three quarters of the sites on that list weren't
defaced at all? Is that fair to the sites that weren't hacked, to
disparage their names and claim them as being hit when they weren't? Is
that fair to attrition's reputation, to have us list sites and claim them
as defaced when they weren't?
In other words -- yes. We check. And if we find that you're in the habit
of submitting sites that aren't defaced buried among sites that are, we're
not going to be happy.
Growing up is an option. Consider it.