<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/27/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Andre Ludwig</b> <<a href="mailto:andre.ludwig@gmail.com">andre.ludwig@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On 9/26/05, security curmudgeon <<a href="mailto:jericho@attrition.org">jericho@attrition.org</a>> wrote:
<br><br>> All lists here require confirmation of subscription, so a single spoofed<br>> mail will not do the trick.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> widdershins mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:widdershins@attrition.org">
widdershins@attrition.org</a><br>> <a href="http://www.attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/widdershins">http://www.attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/widdershins</a><br><br><br><br>i see now...<br><br>But what if a single trick was spoofed to the mail as a confirmation
<br>to the subscription list?!!<br><br>As always i blame the hurricane machine, baby midget jesus, and the<br>aliens for the seemingly perfect blend of chaos, delusions, and mild<br>humor in this message.<br><br>So whats everyone think about securing information by encrypting its
<br>display mechanism and controling its disimenation?<br><br><a href="http://optics.org/articles/news/10/4/20/1#securedisplay">http://optics.org/articles/news/10/4/20/1#securedisplay</a><br><br>and another different technology, with the same results.
<br><br><a href="http://www.merl.com/projects/privatedisplay/">http://www.merl.com/projects/privatedisplay/</a><br><br><br>Dre<br>_______________________________________________<br>widdershins mailing list<br><a href="mailto:widdershins@attrition.org">
widdershins@attrition.org</a><br><a href="http://www.attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/widdershins">http://www.attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/widdershins</a><br></blockquote></div><br>Its either the LSD or her hubby was using her email.