[VIM] IBM changing significant details?

[security curmudgeon]

At long last..

: On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, security curmudgeon wrote:
: 
: > I am 99% sure the APAR said 'mklvcopy'. I created the OSVDB entry within
: > hours of Secunia's entry and couldn't find any more info than they had.
: 
: This is one more aspect of the provenance problem: who knew what when, 
: and how confident are we that they were right in the first place, and if 
: there was an original source, where is it and barring that, how 
: confident are we that the original source was interpreted correctly by a 
: third party?  I don't know if this kind of problem is getting more 
: pronounced, or if I'm just getting more sensitive to it now.

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-04/0481.html
NSFOCUS SA2006-02 : IBM AIX mklvcopy Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

NSFOCUS Security Advisory (SA2006-02)
IBM AIX mklvcopy Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Release Date: 2006-04-24
CVE ID: CVE-2006-1246

The vendor has released Patch APAR IY82739 to fix the vulnerability. The 
related 
link is:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IY82739

--

So the bos.rte.lvm vs mklvcopy issue comes to light. Same thing it appears 
=)