<DIV>elm, pine ... </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Lori.<BR><BR><B><I>security curmudgeon <jericho@attrition.org></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>: There are SIMPLE mail clients that do not support anything other than<BR>: plain text and are not vulnerable to the problems that plague the<BR>: complicated over featured software most users use. Less is more! (more<BR>: Security that is).<BR>: Lori<BR><BR>Really? For the sake of argument, could you provide such examples? =)<BR><BR>I think it would be more appropriate to say there are simple mail clients<BR>that do not suffer from *as many* or *as serious* vulnerabilities as<BR>Outlook and some of the other more popular and widely deployed mail<BR>clients.<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>govsec mailing list<BR>govsec@attrition.org<BR>http://www.attrition.org/mailman/listinfo/govsec<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>