<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/11/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Al Mac</b> <<a href="mailto:macwheel99@sigecom.net">macwheel99@sigecom.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The data base has coding <a href="http://attrition.org/dataloss/dldoskey.html">http://attrition.org/dataloss/dldoskey.html</a> as to<br>nature of breach that could narrow you down to this kind of relevance, but<br>this is something that continues to evolve, and be improved upon by
<br>feedback here. I do not see in the chart a coding for the nature of the<br>breach:<br>* laptop gone missing<br>* dumpster diving<br>* hacker broke in<br>* data managers must have been computer illiterates<br>* data managers must have been privacy illiterates
<br>* e-mail stupidity<br>* etc.<br>so if you do a search of the raw data, looking for "e-mail" you going to<br>get a lot of hits that what was breached was person's e-mail address</blockquote><div><br><br>You make a good point - this is definitely something else we should be tracking in the DLDOS.
<br></div><br></div><br>