From: security curmudgeon (jericho[at]attrition.org) To: Jeanne.Hamburg@bakerbotts.com Cc: staff[at]attrition.org, sioda[at]attrition.org, alpha[at]attrition.org Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:31:45 -0600 (MDT) Subject: RE: INFRINGEMENT BY ATTRITION.ORG Dear Jeanne Hamburg: The postal address associated with Attrition.org is fictitious. No US Postal mail was received from you or your firm. Further, you erroneusly claim you have received no communication from me after. That is an outright lie, or someone at your firm has mishandled this dialogue. Your firm mailed a word document with no explanation to jericho[at]dimensional.com on June 4, 2001. I replied to that mail (originally sent by Dorothy.Izak@bakerbotts.com). Further, I replied from jericho[at]attrition.org on June 4, 2001 in reply to your "Unprofessional Conduct" (the subject of the e-mail), which was sent to firstname.lastname@example.org and Jeanne.Hamburg@bakerbotts.com. I once again told you that you needed to send me your original mail in ASCII text, not a Microsoft Word document. Your next communication was June 21, 2001 and was replied to within 2 business days despite your irrational demand that I reply by the next day. I will state right now that your initial lack of reply and subsequent seventeen day reply puts you in NO position to demand my immediate replies. Because someone in your organization did not share my mail with you does not mean I didn't reply. The fact that you have multiple people contacting me and not coordinating on your side reinforces my opinion that this is a frivilous lawsuit and focuses on threats and harassment to get your way. Would you care to cite which two cases you have concluded that resulted in termination of infringing uses? After I read more about those I will then give this issue the attention it deserves.